Cannabis Business

Pe142 Tell All: Big Money in Cannabis_Part 2

Hucksters exist in every industry, and many get away with it, even getting bonuses and pay outs while the business fails. Big money has been moving into cannabis for a while now, but is it all bad? Certainly some of it is, but many big companies do good, how can you tell the difference? Our guest is Jesse Peters, Founder & CEO of Mantis Growth Investments. Jesse has plenty of experience in cannabis and the ways of big money. Listen in to see behind the curtain!

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe141 Tell All: Big Money in Cannabis_Part 1

Hucksters exist in every industry, and many get away with it, even getting bonuses and pay outs while the business fails. Big money has been moving into cannabis for a while now, but is it all bad? Certainly some of it is, but many big companies do good, how can you tell the difference? Our guest is Jesse Peters, Founder & CEO of Mantis Growth Investments. Jesse has plenty of experience in cannabis and the ways of big money. Listen in to see behind the curtain!

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe140 The Race to Patent Cannabis_Part 2

As Big Ag works to patent, own and control cannabis, what will be the outcome? In this podcast series we discuss “This company filed the first cannabis patent—and nobody knows who they are” from Leafly by David Bienenstock.

Link to watch Mark Lewis’s Cannabis Pharmacology video.

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Listen to our podcast episode with the series author discussing cannabis history & the evolution of cannabis media Pe071 - Author & Producer David Bienenstock.

Pe139 The Race to Patent Cannabis_Part 1

As Big Ag works to patent, own and control cannabis, what will be the outcome? In this podcast series we discuss “Inside the billion-dollar race to patent cannabis” from Leafly by David Bienenstock.

Listen to our podcast episode with the series author discussing cannabis history & the evolution of cannabis media Pe071 - Author & Producer David Bienenstock.

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe137 Change in Direction Announcement

You may have noticed a trend in recent episodes. Companies being challenged to adapt and solidify product market fit as the cannabis market evolves. We’re not immune to these changes, and have decided we need to adjust our strategy. This episode discusses our challenges at Periodic and a new direction for the podcast.

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe136 WeedWeek Swapcast part2

Listen in as Wayne interviews Alex & Donnell from WeedWeek about their journey and a behind-the-scenes look at running a media company in the cannabis industry. WeedWeek has been a staple in cannabis education and activism.

Link to Forbes Article - 2019 Top Eight Cannabis Podcasts You Need in Your Life.

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe135 WeedWeek Swapcast part1

Listen in as Alex & Donnell from WeedWeek interview Wayne about Periodic Edibles and why he started the Periodic Effects podcast. Get a behind-the-scenes look at decision making strategies for small “craft” companies in the cannabis industry.

Link to Forbes Article - 2019 Top Eight Cannabis Podcasts You Need in Your Life.

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe134 The Mary Jane Soda Story

Matt Moody started Mary Jane Soda in 2008. After some initial success and media attention, the business ended up closing its doors. We discuss why that happened & the lessons he brought to his new company, Bellwethr. As many more Hemp CBD companies come online and competition increases in THC markets, it’s critical to adapt to changing market conditions as early traction doesn’t guarantee long term success.

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe133 Longest Standing Edible Company in Oregon

Business focused episode. The cannabis landscape is evolving quickly. It moves even faster in “pro small business” States that didn’t create an Oligarchy with high costs and low license caps. Our guest is Elbe from Elbe’s Edibles, the longest standing edible company in Oregon. We discuss their 10 Years experience in cannabis and why “crystal ball” predictions are hollow.

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Episode Transcription:

Wayne Schwind, Host: Alright, joining us today is Elbe from Elbe's Edibles, otherwise known as Laura Brannan, co owner and Chief Creative Officer of Elbe's Edibles. Thanks for joining us today, Elbe. You guys just had your 10 year anniversary, you're one of the oldest, longest standing edible companies in Oregon. So I'm really excited to have you on today and get your insights, thoughts on the market. All those different things we'll dive into. So thank you for taking the time.

Laura “Elbe” Brannan, Guest: Oh, thank you Wayne. I am really excited to talk to you today. And yeah, our 10 year anniversary will be coming up on July 1. Well, we're about nine and a half years in, but we are super excited about that.

Wayne: Yeah, I'm sure it's been a hell of a journey. A lot we could talk about - how did the name Elbe come about for the company? And I always thought your name was Elbe until recently.

Elbe: Yeah, well is the name I prefer to go by, in general, my biological name or birth name is Laura Brannan as you introduced me. And when I was in junior high, my friends just started calling me LB. I think there was a character on Happy Days Lori Beth and she also went by LB, so kind of the same timing that might have been the start of that. And then I just kept being LB through high school and Coach ended up putting E-L-B-E on the back of a jersey. And that's how Elbe became LB. And that's who I've been since I was about 17.

Wayne: Awesome. I imagine early on and even still, now the market is so, you know, it's very relationship based. Was there kind of a thought when naming the company that putting the face behind it in the name? What were you kind of thinking with naming the company there Elbe's Edibles?

Elbe: Well, Wayne, if I really would have had this magic crystal ball, I wouldn't have put my name on it. Because I have to tell you that is problematic at times because I'm no longer a private person. I'm a public face. And so that is something to think about for anybody who's listening to this. When you're thinking about naming your company, really think about those things. It became Elbe's Edibles because my husband Hovering and I, we had a photography business. We were professional photographers, and we started making edibles because my best friend's mom got breast and lung cancer. And we just started making food for her. We went to a patient potluck. And these two kids walked up to us and said, "Hey, have you ever heard of brothers cannabis club?" And I was like, "no sure haven't." And they're like, "Well, we're one of the few clubs in Oregon that gets food to patients, would you come and talk to our boss?" And so when I went and talked to their boss, Bo from brothers cannabis, he's like, "Really, if you just put these in packaging and put a name label on it, we could really get these locations." Well, my name was Elbe, so we just started calling it Elbe's Edibles, and that was how the accidental business started.

Wayne: That's amazing. So that's how the - What was it, what was it like? I mean, back then was a really hard for patients, I'm assuming they could source flower, probably some extracts, RSO, but was the edible landscape really difficult for patients?

Elbe: It was ridiculous. It was really hard. In fact, most of our patients - I told you we were photographers; about three weeks after we met Bo from Brothers Cannabis, I just looked at Hov one day on a drive and I said, "I want to quit photography and I want to do this full time." And he was like, okay, crazy. Let's do that then. And we had - I think there was WeedBook, was like a forum online for a few days. There was reader boards at dispensaries. But truly in those first years, we only had three or four dispensaries that we delivered to. But most of the time we were meeting patients in the Fred Meyer parking lot after dark or going to their apartment. But you know, there was so many fears around it at that time, we really were still meeting people in dark alleys. And we were meeting people outside of their homes because they didn't want their kids to know that they were using cannabis or they didn't want their kids to know they were even sick sometimes. Yeah, it was very, very hidden, hidden in those first couple years.

Wayne: And what kind of patients - I mean how are you thinking about products? I'm guessing you probably were meeting a lot of different people with completely different kinds of ailments or issues they were trying to figure out by using cannabis. Was it difficult to figure out products early on, like what types to make and then different, you know, for different patient needs?

Elbe: You know, Yeah, that's kind of kind of a long answer to that. When we first started, we were basically just growing and making food for the majority of our friends and then their friends. It was like one of those networking things. Hey, my friend has breast cancer. Do you think you could help? Hey, my, my brother's having seizures, my sister's having migraines. And so by word of mouth, even in those first couple of months, we were flooded with requests. And though as soon as you start taking care of patients then other patients - you know, the, the, you know, if you even just thinking about how the internet was even 10 years ago, when we started this was a lot different. So you asked about how we came up with the items. Truly what we were doing at first was treating symptoms, treating side effects from medications and treating side effects from treatments for cancer. And so we were looking at things from that perspective. How do we make people who are sick, feel better? And we had the - as I mentioned before, my best friend's mom Kathy, she was really kind of our guiding force and is still kind of the voice at the back of my head. She made it very clear to me just in her actions and her words, how awful it was to go through cancer, not just because she was sick, but because everything phone calls you have to do all day paperwork you have to do explaining to other people in your family. It's just this whole life effect of having cancer.

Wayne: Money, finances, on top of all that, which is such a burden.

Elbe: Dealing with your spouse and how your spouse is doing - and here's the other thing, Kathy's husband was a retired sheriff's deputy. And he was a sergeant. So it wasn't like they were going to be open to smoking weed in their house. It was something that also too you know, the conversations had to start very delicately. That said, there wasn't a lot of information out there. There wasn't a lot of THC cookbooks out yet. There wasn't Canna-butter recipes on the internet really yet. So what I did was my mom was an antique dealer. My mom and dad, and I had a bunch of old antique cookbooks from them on hand because I always cook. And what I noticed about them was, in the old days, the cook or the mom had to be the doctor in the house because your doctors were 400 or 500 miles away. And so in a lot of these old pioneer cookbooks, they talked about different foods that were good for different ailments. And in one particular cookbook, I remember it being like, you know, they were - moms were treating heartburn, hemorrhoids, headaches, tooth aches, muscle aches, and it had all of these things in this book on how to use ingredients to make your family feel better. And I started thinking, well, if lemon was used 300 years ago for belly aches, what was that about? And so I started digging into it. And I found out that when you add lemon to something, it hits your belly, it upsets your pH balance. And then there's a signal from your brain that says, hey, we need to mellow out this belly. And so really what it was doing was, how can I use ingredients that we know how they already worked with the body? How can I figure out how that works well with cannabis? And we just started experimenting on about 12 of our friends, you know, every way we could think of.

Wayne: Getting feedback and - that's so funny. My significant other is Chinese and her grandma, you know, grew up in rural China. She doesn't speak English, but whenever like one of us gets a little bit sick or something like she's got something for you to eat. That just reminded me of that so much, because doesn't matter what it is, she's ready. She's making something, some kind of soup, some kind of terrible tasting elixir that you gotta drink and it's gonna help.

Elbe: Let me stick this thing on your chest. Yeah, I grew up here in Oregon. I was born here in 1968. My parents were parents in the 70s. They are - they hate to be called this but there they were hippy dippy. And for sure my mom would stick cloves in my mouth if I had a toothache, or made me drink aloe vera in my orange juice, you know, like, so those things were kind of already in me. And because I had this influence of moms trying to make things better on a budget or because they didn't have doctors. I just went with that. And so I spent a lot of time researching foods, how they work in the body, how the body reacts to breaking down fat and for me every little single bit of that just added to my recipe book.

Wayne: Yeah. How - What did you learn early on, and how are you thinking again, what different products you were making? And then I guess leading up to rec I want to, that probably is gonna be a separate conversation. We'll get there, but I mean, the markets changing, you're learning. Were products changing every six months every year doing new ones, or did you have some consistent, like your foundation products? I mean that right, because you went five-six years in the medical market before the rec came around.

Elbe: When we - when we went from medical to recreational I had 32 menu items. And so yeah, and they were so this is how I did it in the old days. First, we started with just a couple basic cookies. And I was like, oh, okay, that works. And you know, again, this was before labs, and what we did was, I don't know if you've noticed we have a star on our logo. We decided, well, if we make a recipe with this amount of butter in it, it's probably going to be this strong. From our test group. We had this group of friends that were all genders, all ages, some sick, some healthy, tall, short, fat and skinny. And we were collecting information on them all the time. And one of the things we found out right away was, it didn't matter size, shape or gender. Every single body reacted a different way to edibles. But that body reacted consistently to that, to edibles once you figured out their, their - their puzzle. And so we figured out that if we put this amount of butter in the candies, the - we should put a one or a two star on it because that was going to be a lower dose around. Now we would probably compare it to five or 10 milligrams, and then we had things all the way up to 12 stars. And that's how when we labeled things in the medical days, we would put the stars on our package. So a customer, a medical patient can walk into a dispensary and said well, you know, I tried one of Elbe's cookies, it was three stars, and that was a perfect dose for me. And then you could look across my menu line. And anything that was three stars, whether it was savory or sweet, would then work, that would be about the same amount of medicine getting into you. And so like I said before I started it by treating symptoms. And so first it was cookies. And then I started thinking about, well, mostly everyone I know is really nauseous from their radiation or their chemo. So how can I deal with nausea, so then I started digging in and making foods that had a lot of lemon bases in them and an orange bases in them. And then I started having a lot of patients request, I get migraines all the time, I've got headaches all the time. So then I started digging into what really works well for migraines, and then develop menu items from that. So everything in the, in the beginning days was patients coming to me and saying, I have this thing that's going on, can we fix it, and then if I can fix it for them privately, then I would introduce that to a dispensary and if people enjoyed it, then I kept it on the menu and if I introduce something dispensaries and nobody liked it, I was like, Well, obviously that didn't work. And so really everything for the first five or six years until recreational, everything here was reactionary. Like you we have a problem. Let's fix it, you have a thing that's going on. Let me see if I can make that better for you. So that's how we decided all of our product lines. And we got really sick of making candy. So we made cookies. We got sick of making cookies. So we started making pound cakes and lemon bars. And then everybody started telling me you know, sugar feeds cancer. Can you make savory products? So then we did a spaghetti sauce. We did empanadas. We did chicken pot pie, beef pot pie. Macaroni and cheese, macaroni and ghee-se. So we you know, every time somebody complained or asked for something, that's how we developed our menu, and that's really it. It was really just that that's silly and simple.

Wayne: Yeah, that's so beautiful too because the early days to be able to do - I mean that's the ultimate way I think you want to build a business, is test quickly, small product batches, and let the market tell you if they want it or not. The state we're in this, rec - you need regulations, it's, I don't know, it's always a back and forth of how much how little but you really can't operate that way now,. If you want to roll out a new product line, the control study, the packaging, the approval, like you're investing a lot of time and money just to get a new line out. You really, that's difficult to do now. And then if it doesn't work, to turn around and walk away from it, you're like, well, I just put so much money into that and time to get it through. That's great you were able to do that.

Elbe: It's the biggest stumbling block about working in edibles in the current market. We tell everybody, it's about $10,000 to bring an item from recipe to the shelf. And that's a huge investment without knowing something's going to work. Or in my case last year, I had two items that I brought to the shelf that were really working well and customers loved it. But then the state said, how you're testing it is not working and we had to pull that product. So we have this tested product. We put the money in into it the label into the labor into it. And then the state's like, "Yeah, no." (Laughter)

Wayne: Yeah, that's the other thing, that states set the regulations and enforces them and there's always a little bit of gray. You know, how they're going to interpret it. And ultimately, what comes down to it. It's their decision when they're not as informed normally, they're not inside the business doing it day to day and yeah, that's Yeah, it's growing pains. It's a big part of this now, it makes it a lot harder.

Elbe: It's also hard when you are talking about hiring employees who love to work in food, you know, we have always considered Elbe's "Food First". I try to really explain this to people. I know a lot of people get very excited, Oh, I want to work in cannabis. I want to come work at your edibles company. And I you know, I just never hire anybody who wants to work at an edibles company. I only hire people who want to work for food. Cannabis is one tiny ingredient in my food. It's just one of the things. And most of the time when people work in food, they get really excited because it's a creative environment. And you get to try new things. And, you know, I've worked in plenty of kitchens where recipes are developed on the spot. Right now, we're not really able to do that, because we can't be creative in our kitchen. And you're only allowed so much R&D and you're only allowed to try, you know, so many things. And, you know, we'll get there Wayne, but I'm not very - it's not as much fun as it was for sure. And I mean that sincerely across the board. It was a lot more fun to work in edibles in the medical day. Yeah, because there was so much satisfaction from the consumer. And from making it and I think right now one of the problems, and you probably feel this too, is you don't get a lot of joy in being able to make your product because it's so regulated and so regimented. And then we are cut off from our consumers because we have a retail store. And so we don't get that feedback from them that they like our - the only feedback we get is how many units were sold. And that's, that's hard. That's a that's - when you work in food in general, most people who work in food are making food in an area and then serving it to somebody right away, you know, and some of that stuff is lost on us.

Wayne: Yeah, that's such a change. And I think the perception of what people would think edibles are, or how this business works, you know, that you really got to correct that misconception, because it's really important one, how much it changes, you know, the business and the role or what someone might be doing. What would - You know, you talked about savory, people. I've heard that more and more. And over the last three or four years that we've been operating, people wanting more savory options. I still don't see very many of those on the market, is that because we went into the recreational market now? Was there more savory options in the medical days? Do you know why those just aren't as - I hear the demand for them, but I don't see them on the shelf just savory option edible options. There's a few but not very many.

Elbe: Yeah, I tell you, it always comes down to the same thing for me, I, I say this a lot. We're all learning at the same time. And just like you and I had to learn how to go from medical to recreational food processing, the dispensaries had to go through that change too and right now the dispensaries are retail stores, right. And the people who are running the retail stores and who are managing the retail stores. They probably didn't spend a lot of time working with their background in grocery stores or food services in general. And so until the dispensary's understand how to deal with fresh food, how to deal with rotating stock, there's just not going to be probably a lot of people who are going to take that risk and jump into savory food because your shelf life is shorter. And it requires attention from the store and from the manufacturer. And that's because food has to be handled safely. And right now, the dispensaries and I get it, It's really easily easy to handle things like gummies and things like that, right? You throw them in a safe, and you throw them on a shelf. My food has to be refrigerated. My food has to be rotated, my food has best by dates on it. And when you are running a dispensary and you have 500 brands to take care of, having a brand that requires extra care is not always easy for the dispensaries. And so when we talk about savory foods, we are going to be talking about the dispensaries having to level up on their responsibility for dealing with vendors who deal with food. Because one of the things you might have noticed is in the winter time, my food is in the refrigerators and it has all the space I need. But in the summertime, when the dispensaries get warm and the extracts start melting, suddenly my food leaves the shelf and they throw the extracts into the refrigerators. You can't do that with food. I still have, I still have dispensaries who have in the last year, taken my food out of refrigerators at night and put it into their safes to lock it and then put it back into refrigerator. That's something we can't do. You can't take food out of the refrigerator and put it into a warm space and then back into a refrigerator.

Wayne: Yeah, and they have their own regulations, they've got to store everything in their secured storage area.

Elbe: Yeah, and so until everybody kind of elevates our responsibilities and our eyes for detail. There's going to be a lot of things that are going to be coming down the road and I think savories are coming down the road kind of situation. The packaging alone is a nightmare for food, as you know.

Wayne: Yeah. And you can't make small batches. Which you probably need to do for savory. With the lab costs you have to do a big process lot. So you want to do you know, at least 1000 units, maybe around or even a little more. And then that whole time while it gets lab tested and you got to get the packaging printed with the right - and next you're looking at a three week hold. Where normally in any other food industry, you make that product, potentially go sell it the next day. There's nine weeks off your shelf life just by on the waiting time.

Elbe: That's - That's what I'm saying, it's like, do you want this chili that's been sitting in my fridge for three weeks, right? No, no. (Laughter) But, eventually we'll get to canning and we'll get to you know,. pressure - pressure containers, all of that stuff is available to us. But again, a company like ours at Elbe's, we are a tiny mom and pop, there are really six of us that - three full time people and three part time people and the six of us make the food, sell the food, deliver the food and keep the place clean. They're like that's, that's our full time job. And so we don't make a ton of money, we're not you know, nobody's making money in this industry right now. But if I want to get into savory food I have to invest $50,000 for a horizontal flow rapper machine. You know and then I have to invest another $50,000 for machine that I can make soup, you know, a kettle machine. So those are also the things that are down the line. A lot of the savory foods require huge amounts of money going out the door just for the equipment.

Wayne: Yeah, that's one thing I found so interesting, you know, smaller companies. I'm always curious, you know, cuz we're in a very similar position, smaller company and wondering how we can compete against bigger companies. But one thing that's interesting is everyone looked at this industry as the green rush, but the bigger companies that have went public or on the Canadian Stock Exchange, they have to release their numbers. I have not seen a single profitable company be listed or - that has to like publicly show their numbers, not a single one. And I still see some people say green rush every so often.

Elbe: I'm still related to people and I still have friends, even though I've been doing this for 10 years. Even though I've been broke as a joke for 10 years. They still think that I am going, like I have gold in my house, I have gold bars. But Wayne the truth is, is that Hovering and I have gone without heat for the last four years. We can't afford oil. When you say how do we - How do we survive against the big companies? I don't know. But I do know this, that we have sacrificed everything for 10 years. We work seven days a week, we work 16-18 hour days, our business partner Gretchen who works with us, she came on as an employee, we've given her part of the business. She works as many hours as we do. And we also don't have any money to waste. So when I look at the big companies, and I see them with banners everywhere and I see them at conferences everywhere. I just assume that they're losing money. But I don't know for sure. I don't, all know is for us, how we're going to manage this is we are just going to keep our head down and keep working and keep working and not ever quit. Never, ever quit, be super flexible and never quit. And I think that's how we'll stay open. If that doesn't work, then I don't really have any other math because it's just hard work and determination. And I think that any respectable brand will tell you that it's hard work and determination. Not Instagram followers. But that said, that's a huge important part of this industry that I wasn't prepared to deal with. As somebody in my 50s, I hear all the time, "Elbe, your social media game is weak." And I'm like, "Dude, I know, my computer game is weak. But my bacon game is strong." (Laughter)

Wayne: Yeah, right? I think if anything in this, you know, if anyone's selling a product online or the hemp CBD stuff, you know, it's so much more important there, because someone can hit "buy now" from your website, but I think the reputation, the relationships, and then the legacy that you've built, being in the stores, and just that word of mouth over time, I think you can be a little weaker on the social media game, I think you cover the more important part, quality and delivery of product, people skills.

Elbe: Yeah, but you know Wayne, the people who are telling me that are the people in their 20s and 30s. Like you really got to get on the social media thing. And I try to listen to them because, you know, it's - it's the world we live in.

Wayne: And you got to pick and choose, like you said, when you know, you're looking at every dollar you're spending, what's going to be the most effective- money and time to spend. How do you - This is such a hard question, but it's something we struggle with and think about, like, how do you see this playing out in three, you know, one year, three years, five years? Is there a balancing point, like some stability, where we can say, Okay, this is our revenue, it's probably going to stabilize because Oregon, there's a ceiling, Oregon's not a big state, you know, there's only so many stores you can sell into. But we've seen this flood of new companies new investments, like constantly coming. Does that end eventually? And then then I think, well, interstate commerce or federal legalization? And does it start all over again? Like it's so hard to know, this timeline that we're on? You know.

Elbe: I think one of the things that I have figured out working in cannabis is that all of the crystal balls are completely fucked. Right? None of them are right, nobody has any idea. And I mean that sincerely. Because I cannot tell you how many meetings I have set in with potential investors or idea people or future tellers or future trippers, and none of that has come true. I would say it's a lot harder than I thought it was going to be. The rules are a lot worse than I thought it was going to be. The banking is tougher than thought it was going to be. And you asked me When is it going to change? And I'm, I think that I'm going to constantly stick with this answer - it's going to change when enough white powerful people have lost enough money in cannabis that banking gets changed.

Wayne: Or the tax code would be a huge one for us.

Elbe: Tax code, again though, like what I was just talking to you about, I would love to be able to go to my bank and say, hey, I've been in business 10 years, I have a great following. People love my product. I really love to expand my product line, can I please get $150,000 so I can buy these pieces of equipment? And, and this new, you know, labeling that I need? And every other industry, you have that ability to go to your bank and if you have good credit and you are in good standing, your bank will say yes Elbe I approve that loan. And let's make you a bigger badder company so you can hire more people in your city and state. But that's not where we are. And so always until we get banking, investors are going to be sketchy. People are going to be nervous, and there's - it's almost impossible to expand your business. And so without expansion, no growth right? Without growth, you die. And so I think really truly until banking gets turned around, I don't know how this industry is sustainable.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah.

Elbe: I mean, everybody I started with is out of business.

Wayne: Yeah. 10 years. Yeah.

Elbe: Not a single person that started with me is in business. And I think that probably three or four years into it is when Sour Bots started. And Danodan, and I think he's, he's in CBD now. Like, you know, it took three or four years for people to really be in the dispensaries with me, and most everyone is gone. Yeah. And it's you know, it's devastating because these are friends and family members that you get attached to and we're all trying to work towards the same goal. And, you know, I gotta be honest, though, at this point 10 years in, I try really hard not to focus on those things anymore. Right? Honestly, when I said that, that the future tripping it does not help, it does not help trying to figure out how this industry is going to go because this industry, we don't even know who, who our president is going to be in a couple of months. Right?

Wayne: Yeah. You just got ready and adaptable constantly. Yeah.

Elbe: I mean, I think that's really the key. That is the biggest, I think the biggest reason that we're still open is flexibility. Every time we get new rules, okay, pivot, every time we get a new challenge, pivot, every time something doesn't work out, pivot. I mean, you know, Gretchen Homer, our CAO, she sent us a text on Friday when we were out delivering, saying, "Oh, the new rules are going to be published. I can't wait to read them this weekend." Because that's her jam. She loves reading the new rules, and figuring out how we're going to adapt. And I'm so happy to have somebody on my team like that, because I see the new rules and I'm like, Oh my god, what's happening? What? What can we do?

Wayne: Yeah, you know, we started in 2015 and I'm trying to - You saying that made me kind of think, you know, who I saw when we started versus now and have might be, you know, we're five years later, almost six it was late 2015 and half the companies maybe that I remember and recall, but I have seen a lot go over to the hemp instead because lower regulations, easier, there's not that tax code, maybe the banking's little easier. Have you looked at or considered the hemp CBD side or I guess have thoughts on that?

Elbe: You know, for sure we've definitely thought about it because we're awake. (Laughter) You know, we lived through watching weed go from $5,000 to $400 a pound, and we are seeing that with hemp, right. And we're also because - we lived through an unregulated market with medical and have really hardly any competition and now entering into an another unregulated market with more competition than you can handle? Like, you know, it's, it's one of those things, it's, it's something that we're definitely not opposed to. I mean, we're always looking at other states and we're talking to other investors. You know, we still don't have any investors, we're still just a mom and pop with just friends and family investment, we're still looking for that team or that person that wants to help us level up. Part of that leveling up would of course be to have CBD lines only and hemp lines and all of that. Again, though, my focus every day is keeping the doors open for my employees who work here and getting the products on the shelf for the customers who are already relying on it. The big picture ideas, I leave those up to Hovering and Gretchen, because it's not my specialty and it's really not my, what I'm interested in. I am a product developer, I am a food specialist, whatever title you want to give me, I want to be in the bakery, making the food, coming up with new ideas and, you know, just working that angle. The rest of it, whether it's CBD or hemp, I can make any recipe with those products in it if you want food wise, also topically, so yeah, the big the big answer is yes, we've looked at those things. The short answer is no, I'm not in a big rush. I'm not in a rush.

Wayne: Yeah, see how it plays out. And you almost - I mean, you can't make it in the same kitchen. That's the other huge issue, if you could it would be a lot easier. But now you need a second operation, a whole new commercial kitchen. I mean that - there's a lot of cost opening up a second location just...

Elbe: And that, I have got to tell you, it is one of the most ridiculous parts of our regulations in recreational cannabis. The rules concerning how I can use my bakery, my personal bakery that I have built and you know, that is really hard to handle for me. I get requested all the time to make non-medicated munchie food, I can't do that here. I am not supposed to make birthday cakes here for my friends and family members, you know that - the rules of how I can use my office space in off hours is really prohibitive when you're trying to build your business as well.

Wayne: Yeah, and those are side streams of income that you could really use to support yourself you know, when you're a small business, that's the adaptable part but yeah, being locked in, it's hard to be adaptable or come up with those unique creative ideas that could you know bring cash flow.

Elbe: I mean, wouldn't you love to teach classes in your, in your space? I would love to teach people how to do Canna-butter classes here, but we're not supposed to do that.

Wayne: Is the fear then - I, I don't know if you know this on the regulation side or why this is the case - are they just really afraid of cannabis or THC ingredient could somehow get into that other food accidentally and then go out into the market? Is that really the only reason why they don't allow like even making hemp products in the same kitchen?

Elbe: I think that is their public answer. But I do not believe that that's the reason. I believe the real reason they don't want that is they're afraid that we're going to put stuff into the black market without them being able to track it. It's all about taxation and tracking. You know, "we're so afraid, a random person is going to eat a cookie and accidentally get high." If that was really the fear base, we would have a lot more regulations than we actually have. So really, it's about taxation always. And, you know, even how our rules are set up, you know, you know, I think we're only allowed to give our employees a certain amount of edibles. You know?

Wayne: It's very low, yeah. (Laughter)

Elbe: Very low! And you're trying to train people, so I have to go to the dispensary and buy one of my own edibles, and pay tax on it, so I can train my employees. That's problematic for me. So but again, that's, that's down the road. And I have patience for that. You know, when I think about the big picture, really, truly that you and I get to wake up in the morning, and we get to put Canna-butter into some really amazing products, and that there are people waiting all over the state for our products to show up so they can eat them to feel better or to get high. I get real dizzy when I really think about it that way. It's really, it's really fucking exciting.

Wayne: Yeah, we have to remember that. Yeah.

Elbe: Yeah, we have to Wayne! Because when you concentrate on, where are we going to be three years from now? Or how many regulations or how many stupid rules? Or all the things that make it not fun, it can really zap the love out of your food. And so I just really tried to focus on - it's really amazing that we get to do this and this is something I think maybe you can think about too, especially because I think you and I are the only ones who use canna-butter in Oregon. Right?

Wayne: Yeah. It's all I can think of.

Elbe: And I love Crop Circle Chocolates, they put hash butter, but I think we are truly the only masters of Canna-butter in Oregon. Now think about that worldwide Wayne. How many people do you think in the world get to do what you and I get to do every day? Very few! Like that is such a rare air. And I just really concentrate on the fact that at this special time in history, you and I get to do this thing that we were both made to do. I was made to do this. My body is made to make recipes a certain way, my brain works a certain way that I understand how cannabis and food work together. All of those things came together at the perfect time for me to do this thing, which is impossibly hard and ridiculously over regulated and stupidly taxed. But it's fucking amazing.

Wayne: Yeah. It's so funny when I started - and I want to ask, you know why you decided to use Canna-butter and also why you think it's not common and almost nobody does it - and when I started originally, you know, I liked the idea it's simple and clean and I can make my own and not have to buy an extract or set up this you know, huge fire code facility. But when I started, you know, small scale doing r&d batches at home, and then you Google how to make Canna-butter at a larger scale. There's nothing that exists, and I'm like, wow, I guess I have to figure this whole process out. You know, cuz I can't use a little, you know, one gallon crock pot anymore. But why is it so rare?

Elbe: You don't have 55 magic butter machines? (Laughter)

Wayne: Yeah, on a daisy chain of 20 (Laughter) Yeah, outlets and yeah, no, but -

Elbe: I - very simply, I picked butter because I'm a foodie. I'm a food maker and a candy maker and a baker and all those things. I picked butter because butter is full of fat, and fat and cannabis love to hang out together. Oil is you know, monounsaturated or polyunsaturated at best, it has less fat in it therefore less THC in it. Also, as a baker, baking with oil makes cookies flat, baking with butter and makes them fluffy and yummy. So for me again, it's always that cannabis is just an ingredient. I am a baker and a candy maker. How you make food best when you bake is to put a shit ton of butter and sugar and flour in it. That's baking. The same with candy making - How do you make candy great, you put a shit ton of sugar and butter in it and you boil and you stir, you boil and you stir, you boil and you stir. So that's why I use butter. Why do I think everybody else is using oils and extracts? Because butter is hard to make and it's expensive, and it's a lot easier to throw an extract into some oil I have tried it and just whirling around and then put on your - it's easier. Also when you are making gummies and food like that, it's better to not have butter in it because butter is a natural product and butter has a short shelf life. And so there's a lot of reasons to not pick butter when you're doing things. But I just choose to use butter because I think it's a better effect on your body for sure when Canna-butter hits your body. It is a completely different high than when you get high off of an extract or oil based edible. It's just science, and it's just real. So we started in medical, we wanted the most bang for the buck. We wanted to get the most THC into the most fat, and I wanted to be able to make foods that tasted amazing, the number one thing with us and going back to Kathy, the woman I started this business because of, her big thing was because her life was so miserable all the time, that when she got her medicine, which is what she called my food, her medicine, she just wanted it to look good and taste good. And she didn't want to have to plug her nose to swallow it. She didn't want to have to taste stems or seeds. And she really hated the flavor of cannabis. And so well, that's what we did. We just figured out a way to pack as much THC into the butter and then to make that butter tastes amazing and so that - and another reason we use butter by the way, is I find it easier to get the cannabis flavor out of food using butter. That's just the way we make it. Does that kind of answer that for you?

Wayne: Yeah, there's a lot of good points and some things I've similarly thought it is. It doesn't fit into every type of food product. But on the cost side early on. It was interesting. I always looked at it as being a lower cost. I haven't priced out distillates and extracts, you know assuming you still want a full spectrum extract right in there, but early on, you know, it's much more labor intensive. So your costs are on the labor side, the actual ingredients compared to buying an extract were a lot lower cost, right? But I had to build this whole process to make it, there's no like resource or guide on how to make large scale Canna-butter. You know, we need 20-30 pounds a week or something like that.

Elbe: You and Hovering should really sit down and compare your methods because he is my Canna-butter maker. And he, I think there's 37 steps to it. It takes several days, and I just usually stay out of the way because what he gives me is this really clean, highly concentrated butter and you know, we're so - we're just so blessed with the abundance of amazing weed in Oregon, like you know, and I know you know that we source all of our material from Doghouse Farms. And we source indoor bud and close trim. And the reason we do that is because that also helps our process. If something's from outside or it's dirty, or it's, you know, that takes longer to get that clean. And so, for us the method like you said, it took probably a solid year of Hov tweaking the different ways to get it to work for them, you know, making 25 pounds of butter at a time. And the reason we had to figure that out quick is because as you know, when we started this, we were unfairly you, your company and my company, we were unfairly looped in as concentrate makers or extract makers, and my butter went from costing $3.59 a pound to $1,100.99 a pound. And I mean, talking about a heart attack when Gretchen told me the cost difference I was like, well, then we're just shutting the door. Yeah.

Wayne: Yeah I was having similar thoughts. I'm like, I gotta change something huge. And thankfully, I was able to meet up with you guys. We got it figured out. But yeah, that was terrifying.

Elbe: Well, luckily we hired smarter than us and Gretchen was like here I have an idea. Let's fight this, and we're like, we can fight this?

Wayne: Yeah.

Elbe: And so she did. She contacted the OLCC. She got the Department of Justice involved. They all came here, the DOJ came here, the OLCC came here, the OHA came here, all of the, the big brains who make the decisions, and we walked them through our process, and we showed them that we were not concentrating, we were actually diluting, and that this was like the safest method you could possibly, you know, extract cannabis. And when they saw what our method was, they're like, well, there's zero danger in this. Yeah, that's what we were trying to tell you. And so as you know, then we were able to not be considered a concentrate. And we now make a beautiful canna-butter that does not fall under the same restrictions that concentrates fall under so yeah, good job. (Laughter)

Wayne: Yeah, another part of the story, that was an interesting time.

Elbe: Are you considering putting extracts in your food?

Wayne: No, we aren't. We're looking at the hemp side. We've been messing around with that for a little while but even there now with craft hemp. I mean if we had these industrial hemp that wouldn't be possible, but now the craft hemp sources are so - there's a lot of them out there, we would probably just make butter and we do the vegan caramels so for that we use coconut oil instead of butter.

Elbe: Oh, right.

Wayne: But when we put so much time into the method, and we've got it down, it takes you know, the week to make it but a lot of its holding time and certain things so I don't - I can't see a reason I think our costs are still, would be lower than, even factoring in the labor, than just buying an extract or a distillate. And it's one of our big selling points now because it's not an option in almost any other edible so it really helps differentiate us I think as well.

Elbe: I want you to know too Wayne, when we're out selling. You are the company we talk about. We always sell our company with your company. And I mean that, like 99% of the time when I'm talking to somebody, and I'm explaining to them Canna-butter I go, you realize that there's only one other company in Oregon who does it like this - us and Periodic. Like, we are Canna- butter masters, and it's really full spectrum and it's not marketing. And I really try to go in with every one of these sales calls, how we do what we do and why that's different than an extract high, why that's different than an extract edible. And I am so pleased to announce that after how many years we've been doing recreational when I have these conversations now, managers are very open to listening to it customers are very open to hearing about it, because at first it just didn't matter. You know?

Wayne: Yeah, those products on the shelf now there's so many stores they're thinking like they're looking at these things now. At first it was just put products on the shelf. Customers just flood in, and you sell everything you got. That doesn't work anymore. So now it does matter. Yeah.

Elbe: Yeah. Well, I'm, I'm really proud of being able to say that we are the two companies that do it. And listen, I know there'll be more canna-butter companies coming down the line. And that's great, good luck to you all because it's hard. And it takes a lot of work. But the other thing is, is I think that one of the things that we can continually do is always educate our consumers, right? And so consumers are catching on that having the whole bud is more important than part of the bud or just this one little part of the plant and I will say that always though marketing is really tricky because there's a lot of people now calling themselves full spectrum and it's just not true.

Wayne: The worst one I've seen is - I saw a product and I won't name any names but it said infused with Canna butter but when you looked at the ingredients, you realize they just put distillate into butter, and then called it Canna-butter and I saw that and I was like oh my god..

Elbe: Oh I know exactly who you're talking about, it's very irritating. And that's why I'll publicly announce - You and I are going to start a Canna-butter Association and you have to bud into your butter to be part of our association. (Laughter)

Wayne: What have you seen around - I think another thing that we constantly are struggling with now is our pricing. So we've really maintained and held our pricing, we haven't decreased it. And it's been important to us for that margin for all these reasons we're listing, but now there's so many other lower cost options coming in. I don't know if those companies are sustainable, if it's to get market share. I just - what have you seen on the landscape? Have you considered consider doing a price reduction or is it a struggle competing against other products? Because there's all these other low low options or what do you think about that?

Elbe: Yeah, it is a struggle, but I'll tell you one thing for sure. We cannot drop our prices. We are - if we drop our prices, we're shutting our doors. We're, we're trying to stay open. And the other thing is, is I'm really irritated by that, that that that people would think that we need to drop our prices. When I have managers asked me to drop my prices lower than a pre-roll, which is bud and paper, and I put eggs, flour, sugar, fresh fruit, fresh juice, I have a bakery, I have employees, I have insurance, I gotta drive a van. And now you want an edible for real like for $1. What? You know, I think it is. It's a real it's a real hard one. In fact, I have a hard time with this conversation because I understand that everybody needs to stay in business and I understand that our tax implication has made it so retail stores have to markup our products 100% - the consumers do not understand that. Soo when they see a price at a dispensary. They think it's crazy, right? They think oh my god, I have to pay $20 for an edible? (Sigh) Yeah, you do, because there's taxes and these people have taxes and I have taxes. And this is a social experiment. We're all trying to do this together. But also, there is food in our food. And so I can't cut the cost. My food costs change all the time. I don't know what it's like to work in a gummy factory. I don't - I assume I've made plenty of gummies in my life, your costs don't really change. You put sugar and flavoring and some, like whatever your recipe is, right? My costs change all the time. And my costs change because gasoline prices because I'm getting eggs from farms, I'm getting butter. I'm getting flour, I'm getting sugar, and I'm getting vanilla. I mean, when I started this company, a bottle of vanilla was $9 and 99 cents for like, you know, like a little eight ounce? That same bottle is 49 damn dollars now because vanilla is almost extinct in America or in the world. And so the cost of vanilla has gone up ridiculously and so, I don't use fake things in my food. So I use real vanilla. I don't use, you know, imitation and so my costs are constantly going up for food. And so I can't lower my costs in the dispensaries and it's really frustrating. Do I think the companies that are selling gummies and hard candies for two or three bucks out the door are going to stay in business? I don't know how. And I also don't understand - this is another confusing part to me. If a dispensary is marking up 100% at least - Why do you want to sell a $2 item versus a $10 item?

Wayne: Yeah, yeah.

Elbe: Aren't you making more money on my item than a $2 item? Yeah, like so it's again, this is one of those things when I talk about the entire industry needs to grow and elevate - dispensaries are learning how to run a dispensary, farms are learning how to run a farm. We are learning how to run a processing facility. All of those things are happening at the same time. And that is very unusual in any industry. I think it's probably out of the world that this is all happening at the same time. Because in any other industries say we you and I decided to sell shoes. There would be watermarks or templates already for how to do that, right? Like, I know if I make a shoe, that I have to have this much margin and that Payless shoes is going to make this much on me and my taxes are going to be that, like we could understand that supply chain. In this world. We're all figuring it out at the same time. And we're all making a lot of mistakes and some small victories and so none of us really know how to do it for sure. And so, unfortunately, we have to learn on each other's backs. And so dispensaries are learning. We're learning and farmers are learning all at the same time. And so - I get that the consumer wants the price point to come down. I really do understand that, I really understand that budtenders and managers will have an easier time moving our products if they're nearly free. But in reality, in sales, I don't understand why anybody in Portland thinks or anybody in Oregon thinks that they should be able to buy an edible that gets them high for six or eight hours and spend less money on that that they spend on a coffee or a cheeseburger.

Wayne: Right. Yeah. Do you think - do you think it's like um, you know, flower, the flower market was really high per pound, 2018 it really crunched it got all the way down to $300-$400 and now it's really went back up to $1000 you know, $900 on the low end even higher. A lot of our growers are like we had a great 2019 our prices are back up. Are we now where - were we just a little bit after the growers and now what's happening to us and it seems like retailers too and it's going to. You know, potentially with backup, or does it feel like it might be a bottom that's not going to move? It's a crystal ball question again, which is never good, like we said earlier, but-

Elbe: It is a crystal ball question but one of the things we have that's different than a couple of years ago, is, and this is the first time I've seen this for our company, you know, we used to have Croptober, and then the market would kind of dry up. And then in January, the market would kind of dry - like, you know, we'd have these cycles, and that's because in the medical days, our customers were customers who were patients. And so they were getting their stuff at the dispensaries and then in the black market. And then when we first went to recreational, we had plenty of customers who were still had a foot in the black market and a foot in the recreational market, right? But as the black market has kind of shifted and done its own thing since the black market cannot - Doesn't really, can't really sell stuff cheaper than we can at this point. What's happened is a lot of customers have crossed over, and now they're just recreational users, or they never used it before, because it was illegal, and now they're users. And so our consumer population has gotten bigger, which I think kind of helps the prices stabilize a little bit. And we don't have those fluctuations because we're not just, you know, counting on the stoners to get us through the year, we're really truly getting a more robust and a bigger variety of consumers. That helps. That said, I don't think that the ebbs and flows are done yet. I do think the prices are going to go up and down and up and down. Because the consumers in Oregon really got used to medical prices, because we had such a robust medical dispensary and robust medical prices. And really, the consumer in Oregon really got used to getting weed for very, very, very cheap prices. And so when you're talking about Oregon, we're always going to have this struggle. If you and I picked up this conversation dropped us down in Michigan, or Ohio, or anyplace else in the United States and we were talking business owner to business owner. I can say to you, you know, Wayne it's probably you know, as we get more customers and our state gets more active, we're just going to get bigger and bigger. And that's a reality if you're someplace that hasn't been growing weed for 400 years.

Wayne: Yeah. Think of California.

Elbe: We ARE California! Washington, Oregon, California have been producing the best weed in the world for 100 years. Yeah? We're not sitting in - we're not sitting in the desert. We're sitting in the rain forest of the weed, huh?

Wayne: Yeah, that's interesting. Yeah, every state is so fascinating how it's so different and how that plays out in the market. And then yeah, as soon as we cross state lines. So many more questions.

Elbe: I was talking to a friend, friend of a friend who does edibles on East Coast and like a cookie that would sell here for, you know, 10 bucks out the door, sells there for 40 bucks. Because there's not that many cookies right?

Wayne: And a lot of those markets are so hyper restrictive. I mean, you'll look at like Florida or something - one company and there's like four or five companies that own all the dispensaries. I mean, I kind of - that sickens me when states create an oligarchy, and you're looking at people with $10 million or more minimum to get into it, and then they own everything. Where Oregon. I mean, we're probably as close as to a free market as you can get, looking at cannabis industries in different markets. Sure, which has been one of our struggles.

Elbe: Yeah, I'm gonna say that wasn't exactly - that didn't serve us. It didn't serve us when we - initially when we had the no out of state investor rule. I think that this, this would have been a little more fair market in Oregon. I think companies would have had a little better time, have been able to start slowly and build up. As soon as that changed, and we allowed outside money, this just became a beta testing zone for cannabis. And I really keep thinking of Oregon is that. I think a lot of people come here, try out things, see if it works. And then they want to take it to other states. And I think as long as that's going on, as long as there's a long line of people who want their licenses, a long line of people who are willing to wait, I think, again, we're just going to keep fluxing on prices up and down, up and down. But I don't know, for sure, because I'm not a farmer. And again, my crystal ball has been broken for 10 years.

Wayne: (Laughter) It's a little hazy!

Elbe: (Laughter) Oh, so hazy. It's cracked, it's full of pot smoke. (Laughter)

Wayne: One thing I want to, as we get near the end here, you mentioned Gretchen, and having employees that turned into equity owners, I was just curious. I think that's really fascinating. I've heard of other companies doing that. I just I wonder how you thought about that, making that decision. And I just I think any listener that's operating in the industry. Whether they're an owner or manager or considering something like that, how does that work exactly? Or how did that play out? And I guess, how did you go about that?

Elbe: Well, I think from the beginning Hovering and I have always been really inspired by companies like Ben and Jerry's, Chobani's. These are companies that we have, as you know, we're entrepreneurs. I told you a photography business before this. I think we've always been really interested in companies who embrace employees. It's just so rare. And we've worked in, Hov and I both worked in such places, such crappy places, and we've hated our jobs. And we've also had the privilege of working in places where we felt like family members. And so when we started this company, we sat down and we said we wanted a couple things out of it. Hov said how do you - how do you think you're going to know that we're a successful company? And I said to him just off the top of my head, when we have 30 employees, full time, full benefits, working for us, I will feel like we are doing something good with our company. And he's like, right on. So that was kind of like one of the first things we thought. And then I said, and then we started talking, and then very next thing that we - I don't know, I think Hov might have brought it up. And he's like, and what about employees owning in the company? And I'm like, absolutely.

So, for us, we kind of look at the world in a different way. We don't have kids. We don't, we're not thinking about this as a legacy we leave on to our children or you know, anything like that. We've always just wanted to build a company, hire smarter than us, stronger than us, and have more vision than us. And if those people get hired, then we would just let them take over their areas of responsibility until it was theirs. And that was just kind of a general idea. So the first five years of our business, we just had that in the back of our mind. And, you know, we've had plenty of part time people and that - there was people that you know, we considered early in our early medical years, hey, should we bring this person on as a partner and? But something never really felt right in our bellies. And then Gretchen Palmer walked into our lives, and she walked in here to do a project for us. We were going to hire her to just kind of do an autopsy on our company say, hey, what are your problems? What are you - What are you doing good, what are you doing bad. She was supposed to be here for like 30 or 60 days, two or three days after working with her, I said to have, oh, we we need her. Like this woman needs, we need to work with her. She makes my brain itch. She makes me think in a different way and Hov's like, "Oh, I was thinking the same thing. Like she has a completely different perspective on this. She hasn't worked in cannabis. She hasn't worked in this world. And so she looks at problems in a different way." So the project got done. We said, we're not, we're leaving. We want you to work with us. Please come and work with us. And she said yes. And then about three weeks after that, we were driving home one day and I looked at Hov and I said in all sincerity. I want to say this - there is no longer in Elbe's unless Gretchen Palmer's involved. And he said, I agree. I said, I don't want to do this anymore without somebody like Gretchen. I want it to be Gretchen. She makes us better. She makes us think that, you know better, she makes us think about things we've never thought about. And that's when we knew we had our first equity employee. When we realized that we had somebody that we wanted to spend off time with. We wanted to have somebody who challenged our brains, challenged how we viewed the world of business. When we had that person standing looking at us directly in the eyes, we knew we needed a partner and that was Gretchen. And that's how we - that was like our first solid one.

We also had a contractor who worked for us, who built this bakery for us. And we told her that if she helped us build this bakery on a good budget, we would give her equity in our company. And so she has a small piece. And then over the years we have told people if you come into this area and you make this area your own, and you're responsible for it and you make it bloom, we will consider making you equity in this company. And sometimes that works and sometimes it doesn't. And a lot of people think that they want to be an owner and a lot of people think that they want to do sweat equity. But sweat equity is exactly that. You work more hours than you put in, you work when you're not here. You think about it all the time. And so Gretchen Palmer fits that to a tee. She loves this company and loves this product no differently than Hov and I do. She can walk into any room and represent us. She can speak for us in any way. And that's how you know you have an employee who deserves part of your company - when you trust them and know that they can represent you when you're not there. Yeah. I think it's so important too because I don't - what do I need a full company for? What, why couldn't Why couldn't Hov and I create something that can create a better life for other families. So Gretchen Palmer now works here. Now her son in law works for us. Her daughter works here part time doing gig work for me. And occasionally her husband, who is a genius in the geek world. He fixes our stuff. And so because she's invested in us, and we've invested in her and her family, and now that will go on to when her son in law and her daughter have a kid, maybe we'll be open long enough that this will help support their family. And we just kind of think in those ways instead of just thinking of p&l, and you know.

Wayne: Yeah, no, it's definitely I mean, it's, it's such an interesting approach and it makes me think about it, it's really a long term long-sighted strategy. And also as an owner, you know, for me right now, as a single owner, it's a struggle because I have certain areas that I think I feel like I'm really good at and I enjoy doing, but I also have to cover so many other areas that I do not enjoy doing, and if I could just free myself to really go out and I'm working on that. I've got some people here that are amazing and really fill in my gaps, but you know, it's still a salary or might be hourly and you don't, it's not - they don't have equity. They're not fully invested. Right? If this thing goes amazing, they're always wondering in the back of their head, could you know I be left with just my paycheck and nothing else? Even if they're invested a lot extra into it. But it's it's interesting to think about and how you might go about that and set that up.

Elbe: I think one of the things you can think about is the risk that your employees take. You know, it's one of the things I think a lot of cannabis companies don't think about. The fact that Gretchen sets here every day and everybody else who sits here every day and works for me. They are - they're giving up other things in their life. You know, you want to go get a home loan, you want to buy a house? Try telling the bank you work for cannabis company. You want a credit card? Try telling a credit card company, you work for Elbe's edibles, it's not happening. And so that is one of the other things we think about. We know we can't pay anything. We everybody here is making a really low wage. So we have free lunch here every day, we give our employees lunch and I make them lunch every day because I appreciate that they are working here on a lower wage, I appreciate that I have to - that their bank account can get closed because I pay them money. I appreciate the fact that they are still doing a federally illegal activity every day when they show up here. Like Hov and I really get that and so, if you can just kind of think that way, your employees feel that and the loyalty that they give back to us and the hard work that they give back to us. That is why they get to own this company too - they take the risk. They do the hard work and when I cry, they try not to act too embarrassed. When I when I am upset by the rules they try to help me figure out how to fix them. You know, it's it really - I know a lot of companies talking about family but we mean it here we, this is our culture. Like I said Hov and I don't have kids. This company is our kid, and these employees are our family members. And when we are gone from this, you know, like I said, we're in our 50s, I don't want to do this for another 30 years, I certainly want to have some retirement in my life, I want to have some downtime. When I walk out of here, if I hand the key to Gretchen Palmer, I will know that she will have everybody in place that she wants to have work for her. And that's why we also put equity into her because you put the people in place that you know, will put more people in place, also to keep this getting bigger and better.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah, those are such good points. And I really appreciate - I'm glad we hit on that because I think for listeners, either just getting into the industry or thinking about it, those are the points that often aren't discussed at all. And it's, you know, it's easy to look at this with rose colored glasses and be so excited. But there's a lot of trade-offs, and it's still very early. So those points are so important to discuss.

Elbe: This is hard work. This is a brand new industry. And so yeah, anybody who's listening to this is thinking about getting into it, I always tell people this. If you really want to open a cannabis business, if you really want to work in cannabis, go work for a cannabis business, go meet the employers, go meet the owners, meet the investors, see the people that you're working with because a lot of people went into this industry all at the same time, from all different backgrounds. So there will be somebody in this industry that you are suited for. It might not be me, maybe you don't want to eat lunch with a crew at lunchtime and put down your phone and talk. Maybe you're more comfortable with your earbuds in and not - and being a little more antisocial. This is not the company for you. But there are companies in this industry for you. For sure. Maybe you like being on the road, then you need to be working for a company that's like has you on the road all the time - that it is a brand new industry that is loaded with opportunities. The opportunity that you need to not think about though is finance, cash. You know if you are getting into cannabis to make a lot of money, you need to wait. You know, listen, I have a - I have a young man in my life that's part of this part of our family like he's 18 years old. And you know, he's watching us go through this journey. And he's just like, he's always like, he goes, like, I can't wait until I'm 21. And I'm going to start a cannabis business, and I'm going to make so much money. And I just, I just think, yeah, that is great. It's so great that somebody young can think about that and think about this as a new industry to get into. That is so exciting to me. And the other part of that is yes, maybe by the time he gets into this industry, he can make a livable wage. Yeah, but we're not there yet.

Wayne: Yeah. Yeah, we're on the journey. Thank you so much, Elbe for the time. I really appreciate it. This was a really great conversation definitely went down some other areas that don't think we have in the past. So I think listeners will like this one. And then I always end on two questions. Just where can people find you if it's a website, social media, and is there anything you want to let listeners know about specifically?

Elbe: Ok, well the first part is you can - I think we're in about 160 stores around the state. So if you go to www.elbesedibles.com there is a location map on that. So if we're not in your neighborhood or not in your area, you can send us an email and we'll try to get to you because that's important to us. We I think we're on Instagram and Facebook. I alluded to earlier that I'm not very good with the social media you can find us there. If you are interested in working for Elbe's you can send a resume and a cover letter to jobs@elbesedibles.com. You should probably tell me why you like Canna-butter in edibles to even have a resume looked at -if your cover letter doesn't talk about canna-butter or edibles I'm probably not going to read it. (Laughter) Cuz you know, we're not a dispensary and we're not farmer. So if you are good at trimming, you're probably not looking to work at a bakery. Yeah, yeah. Another thing I wanted to talk about real quick is we have some exciting things coming up this year that I want you all to look for. We like I said, we have our 10 year anniversary, we are going to have a surprise edible coming out for that 10 year anniversary to celebrate that, it will be 50 milligrams of fun. So look for that. And as we get closer, we'll announce the flavor of that yummy item. And our topical line should be out in a couple months hopefully. We have some more candy coming out or - the next thing coming down the chute is some candy bits, which is basically our candy that we're already making just broken down into five milligram serving size that you can pour into your coffee or on your ice cream. That's the next thing coming down and then our lotion line will be out and then some surprises in the summer and fall.

Wayne: Awesome. Thank you Elbe. That's great. Go check those out. And yeah, appreciate the time and the insights and this will be helpful for a lot of listeners. So thank you so much.

Elbe: Thank you Wayne. And the last thing I'd like to say to your listeners is - canna-butter is different and it's better. Please try it, please try Wayne's products, please try mine - tell your friends and family Canna-butter's the way to go.

Wayne: Yeah and I'd say try them side by side - try a distillate edible, try canna-butter edible and compare.

Elbe: It's my favorite thing to do is to test different cannabis products. I love it.

Wayne: Definitely. Awesome Elbe, well thank you so much!

Elbe: Thanks, Wayne!

Pe130 Predicting Cannabis Trends with Data

Business focused episode. The beginning stages of a new State legalizing rec cannabis is exciting, but what comes next is anything but a smooth ride. Market conditions are constantly changing and staying on top of trends while predicting the future is critical for success. Our guest is Brad Bogus, VP of Marketing for Confident Cannabis, a data driven wholesale platform. We discuss how individual State markets are changing and consumer trends as cannabis goes mainstream.

Job Opportunity: Confident is hiring for Sales & Engineering positions, job postings link.

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe129 Building a Relevant Cannabis Brand

Business focused episode. There are multiple ways companies can create value. This value establishes your brand and reputation in the marketplace. You could compete on price, quality, customer service, convenience, etc, but an often overlooked value is relevance! Our guest is Christina Hadar, Co-Founder & Chief Brand Officer of Oregrown and we discuss how they are building one of the most relevant brands in the cannabis industry.

Link to Join Email List Community for insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Episode Transcription:

Wayne Schwind, Host: Joining us today is Chrissy Hadar, Co-founder and Chief Branding Officer of Oregrown. I'll let her tell you a little bit more about Oregrown, but excited to have you on today. You guys have built a solid brand excited to learn your lessons, process, your thinking and, you know, what's going on there with the business how you built it. So thank you for taking some time with us today.

Chrissy Hadar, Guest: Thank you for having me.

Wayne: For listeners, just starting with a little context, kind of tell them a little bit more about Oregrown, what you do exactly, and then your role as well with the company.

Chrissy: Okay, so Oregrown was founded in 2013 here in Central Oregon, so we're based out of Bend, Oregon. We are considered a farm to table cannabis company, meaning that we do cultivate our own cannabis. So we are known specifically for indoor cannabis, and then we also produce our own extracts at our 84 acre farm out in Tumalo which is just about seven miles north of Bend. And then we have our flagship dispensary here in Bend, we've won Best Dispensary five years in a row. And here we, you know, kind of pride ourselves on offering an exceptional retail experience that is achieved by, you know, offering the best curated cannabis products from throughout the state. And then it's backed by our lifestyle brand, which includes sponsored athletes and then select branded custom Oregrown clothing and accessories.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah, I would love to dive into all those items. Have you from the very beginning - So co-founder, from the start, were you always focused on the brand and marketing, and building that end up of the business?

Chrissy: Um, yes. I'm definitely not - I can't really speak as much for the cultivation side of the business. I have a pretty vast background in retail. So I've managed a few retail stores. And then, when we started Oregrown, we initially had a logo set made up and we had some t shirts made and we threw them online and we noticed that people were actually buying them. And I think that that's when something resonated with us, that we had this opportunity due to the name Oregrown, which is a great name, it can't really be applied to many other states. And it really connects with our consumers. Whether they use cannabis or not. And we saw great opportunity there to kind of use this, you know the way that people think of Oregon as this outdoor utopia, and to basically brand not only our cannabis products but brand the states as this - as whether or not you use cannabis, we are destigmatizing cannabis through showing people that, people that use cannabis are active, they're out there in the - in the community, they're mothers, they're doctors, they're lawyers. And so instead of just telling people that cannabis is something to not be afraid of, we're showing them. (Yeah) I've been able to achieve that through the lifestyle brand.

Wayne: Yeah. I mean, you guys really have built such a strong brand, very recognizable in the state and probably outside of Oregon as well, along with not just that retail experience, the products, the cultivation. At the beginning, you know, a lot of brands are looking at other states for growth. Now federal legalization is becoming a topic. Was that a thought or concern, that with Oregrown, would that be hard to move that outside of Oregon or would it still be possible? Are you guys really saying no, we're going to stay focused inside of Oregon long term?

Chrissy: I think that right now our focus is expanding throughout the state of Oregon. We do have our wholesale products are carried in over 200 retailers throughout the state. We are continuing to open retail stores and some of the better known areas of the states. But I do think that Oregon, prior to legalization was always known for crafting some of the best cannabis in the country. And so I do think that Oregrown as a brand has potential in other states to be successful.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah.

Chrissy: At the same token, we do have plans to take other brands that we have in mind to other states.

Wayne: Okay. Do you brand your line, on the flower side or products, differently? Or is that still all - are all of those under the Oregrown brand umbrella?

Chrissy: They are all under the Oregrown brand umbrella. So all of the extracts that we make, whether it be through our 510, or in our partnership with Pax, or our dabbles - they're all branded Oregrown. One thing that we've done a little differently and if you can see some of our packaging via our website, is we actually have taken kind of a lesson from the craft brewing industry and branded the strains. So the strains are the main focus on the branding of our products, through the artwork, and then Oregrown is kind of hidden in there in a sense. And we really did that because we found, as a retailer going into other retailers to attempt to sell our product, so they carry it and sell it to consumers, that they didn't necessarily want to support the Oregrown brands and help us you know, gain followers. So we decided to brand instead, the strains or the flavors of the product, and that's been really successful. Yeah, and actually a lot of fun.

Wayne: Yeah, I could imagine and being able to create those different brand lines or stories depending on what the strain is, I mean, there's so much room for creativity there and in cannabis right now. I mean, there's no past examples or best practices right now, we're really building the ship as each step we take forward. It's really interesting time.

Chrissy: 100 Percent.

Wayne: With - so starting early on, a lot of, I mean such a focus on retail, you've built this flagship store in Bend, also kind of a lifestyle brand, which ties nicely into retail and the apparel that you make and sell from the beginning, what was the decision making on the strategy to be fully vertically integrated, grow and process versus say, we're just going to stick to retail, and then we could expand that way more? So what was kind of the thinking behind that?

Chrissy: Well, I think that initially we didn't even want to touch retail. And that's because there's so much involved in running a retail dispensary. But after we started the grow and the extraction side of the company, we realized that we didn't really love any of the dispensaries that we were going to and we weren't going to be proud for these dispensaries be carrying our product. So we really want to kind of control the environment in which we felt our premium product would be showcased to the customer. And in addition to that, you know, control the story. And so we went out into the real estate market and attempted to acquire real estate here in Bend to have our flagship dispensary, and found that very difficult. This was back in you know, 2014 prior to legalization of medicinal dispensaries here in Oregon. And you know, we just kept knocking on doors and there happened to be this little spot on Wall Street a few blocks away from the Patagonia store and the main strip of downtown Bend, with Deschutes Brewery and all of that and the owner of the building was just - he was insistent. He was like, I'm not renting to a dispensary and finally convinced him to meet with us. And it turned out that he went to the same high school that I did in Portland, I grew up in Portland. And we had a really good bond. And and eventually he let us rent out the space, and the location has served us well. I mean, we do have a lot of locals as customers, but we definitely serve a lot of the tourists that come to Bend during the winter and summer times for outdoor activities. And that also kind of ties into what helped shape the brand, because the brand really, you know, kind of evolved through the people that were coming through our doors. And so we were able to through opening our dispensary kind of, you know, create this, this culture in cannabis through the people that work here, through our branding, through our messaging, through our advertising. And I think that, you know, after opening your own retail store and realizing what you're capable of doing and the changes you're able to make in the industry. It's something I definitely wouldn't take back despite how much work goes into running a successful cannabis dispensary. It is not for the faint of heart.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah. As soon as you're customer facing versus making the products or growing in the background. It's a lot more - it's a whole different business model. But at the same time, you're now talking to the end consumers directly. There's not that middle person or dispensary, where it's hard for us, you know, to really make that connection to the end consumer. What were you know, you said the brand evolved based on who was coming in the store, what you were learning. What were some of those things that you identified as you evolved the brand or different product lines that were really learned from having the store and being able to talk to those customers?

Chrissy: Well, I think especially during the change from medical only to the recreational market here in Oregon, you know, you found that people were still coming in for medicinal purposes, right? Like they didn't have a medical card, because they never went through the process and the headache of getting one. But they were still coming and stopping by our store on their way home after a day on the mountain to get something to help them relax in the evening or a topical for their aching muscles. And so that kind of, you know, feedback that you're getting from your customers. It was just like, Okay, well we now know the people that come to our store. Yes, they use cannabis for, I mean, we like to call it adult use instead of recreational, so adult use purposes, but they're still you know, using it for what could be deemed medicinal purposes. And so they're - they're active people or they're people coming in to help them sleep or they're people coming in to help, you know, for stress. And so that really paved the way for the brand. And right now we really focus on outdoors. Because up until now Oregrown has been based here in Bend, but with the opening of our Portland store, you know, we'll be focusing on artists and people in the culinary world. And I think that we really just, you know, I see the brand as this living organism, it's nothing that's just stagnant. It's not necessarily a reflection of myself. It's a reflection of everybody that works here and everybody that shops here. So I think the Oregrown that you see now, as this outdoor lifestyle brand, will be entirely different in two years as we move into other parts of the state. And it'll be more of a reflection of, you know, a broader sample of people.

Wayne: Yeah. Yeah, that's interesting. I was kind of thinking with where you're at in Bend, and how you evolved the brand based on those customers. I mean, Bend is such an outdoor city. I mean, great skiing so many things to do there. I'm curious if bringing that store over to Portland, how you might shift the strategy, you know, obviously, here we have Mount Hood, and still a lot of outdoors, but much bigger city. How do you make a decision? You mentioned culinary and artists. When you're coming to Portland, and maybe we could talk about the other cities, you're also going to Eugene and Cannon Beach. How do you think about shifting the brand or refocusing, when you're going into a different city? Like what do you look for? What do you looking at? How do you kind of figure that out? Like what's the right focus to take?

Chrissy: Well, I think that I have a leg up in that I'm from Portland. So I have a lot of connections to people in Portland. And I mean, I think my main goal with moving the brand into Portland is to bring on more diversity. Obviously Oregon isn't known for being the most diverse state in the country, could potentially be one of the least diverse states. But Portland does have more diversity than Bend oddly enough. And so as you know, up until now, it's been a lot of you know, powder shots and surfing out, you know, at the coast and I think it's time to really bring on more diversity, and so that's something that I'm going to be focusing on as we move into Portland. Eugene - college town, I did spend one semester at the University of Oregon and - and I think it goes without saying that we'll be targeting the college market. And the coast has its own kind of little niche where - and that will certainly be an interesting store to manage because of the seasonality at the Oregon coast. Here in Bend we have, you know, seasonality as well when it comes to tourists, but we have the winter season for skiing and snowboarding and, and mountain activities, then we have the summer season for rafting and climbing. So at the beach, you really only have summer, and the summer is quite short. So it's trying to find a way to capture locals in the coastal region, but then really tap into that that tourist market during the hot season. And I think that Oregrown as a brand as a stands now is primed to do that at Cannon Beach.

Wayne: Yeah, see the surfing focus. There's a lot of that carries over what you're doing and Ben but the seasonality of it. Yeah, makes the coast a really fascinating area to operate a business. I mean, large swings in people coming through in the summer versus the winter. Yeah, it's interesting. You talked about Eugene, a college town, kind of focused on that. What are some of the things that would make a brand more appeasing or interesting to that college town or those consumers? Are there specific things when you when you try to focus it in that direction?

Chrissy: Well, one thing we've done successfully here in Bend, and this was kind of from the onset of the opening of our retail stores, we've been really involved in the community. And so we sponsor a lot of the big festivals here in town, like Winterfest, Summerfest, Oktoberfest. And then we have a lot of partnerships with nonprofits. Probably our most notable one would be the Humane Society of Central Oregon, where we have a fund set up to aid in the adoption and support of elderly animals. And by doing that, and going out into the community and being involved, is probably how we've gained so much notoriety here in Bend and I think places like Eugene, where there are so many events constantly going on. It's really just about getting out there and getting on people's home turf where they feel comfortable to come to your booth and ask you questions and look at your swag. It really - it kind of takes that first step of them coming through your door, that fear, away. And so when they finally come into your dispensary, or they finally decide to explore cannabis as an alternative to Western medicine, let's say, you know, they're immediately going to think of your brand, they're immediately going to think of that, you know, one on one experience they had at Summerfest or Winterfest or whatever events we end up doing in other regions and - and that's really been a way for us to kind of take down barriers and also gain a lot of foot traffic.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah, I hear you talk about all those things that I've heard before. You know, being a recognizable brand. And then I heard someone say actually, it's not - the goal isn't necessarily to be recognizable because you can be recognized for the wrong thing. But being relevant, a relevant brand. And that's what I hear a lot when you're, you're talking about the different cities and how you're going to focus. What do these people and consumers care about here? That's a, I really like that kind of thinking just as a mental strategy or exercise. Because it really shifts, I could see you taking the Bend operation, like this is successful. Let's just repeat it. But it's really interesting to me like, well, maybe we need to adjust this strategy. So I...

Chrissy: Well I think, if you just kind of take this cookie cutter mentality, then you're never evolving, right? And before you know it, you're going to be irrelevant.

Wayne: We see quite a bit of that. Yeah.

Chrissy: So you have to be nimble and you have to listen to your customers. And I think that Oregrown's been successful in that, yes, we buy and sell products that we use ourselves and that we like. And that model has always, up until now worked. But that doesn't mean it's going to work forever. And so it's about you know, getting the stores open, adjusting and listening to our customers. Yeah, and we're probably going to make some mistakes, right? You know, some things aren't going to stick, but you mean you have to try to consistently evolve. And to be clear, I mean, look, Oregon isn't California, let's say, where, you know, the places that we're going to do have a similar vibe. Right? Whereas like Northern and Southern California, they might as well be separate countries. And so, you know, we're not reinventing the wheel each time we open a store. That's not our intent as we move forward. It's just to take nods from each region that we go to integrate that into our existing lifestyle model.

Wayne: Right. Before you, you go into a new city or you're looking at a location, is there any specific kind of market research you do? And maybe how do you do that? As you try to figure out what your strategy should be?

Chrissy: Um, I would say there's a lot that goes into it. We're very picky when it comes to real estate and locations. I know that some people would probably say that we've been slow to the punch when it comes to opening up additional retail stores. That's simply due to the fact that A. we are still family funded and operated. And B. we're extremely picky when it comes to real estate. We recognize the fact that location is super paramount. We look at walkability scores, we look at the neighborhoods that we're going into, we look at parking, we look proximity to office buildings and high density living and, and traffic as well - bus lines, how many cars go by a day? And yeah. And it's insanely - it's a logistical nightmare, especially with the way that the wholesale laws are set up. And the transferring of product and having to have to let you know, wholesale hubs and whatnot. I mean, just side conversations I hear of logistical issues that come from wholesaling a product which I'm sure you're very familiar with is is really not my speed. But at the end of the day, I think that retail, you know, you also have this opportunity to create a really fun environment and and sell products that you really love and believe in, and a lot of our flower growers - you know, I don't always just want to sell Oregrown products. I don't want to monopolize our own store, but I do think that working, you know, with your own brands, on the wholesale side, but also bringing on some really craft small batch growers to kind of round out your selection. I mean, that's really our North Star. And and, you know, we're getting there.

Wayne: Yeah, I was gonna kind of ask that too. I mean, I think the brand is hugely important in that relevance creating that and, but at the same time, how important is the actual just physical location to you and then coming in later to these markets, is it harder to find those ideal locations because a lot of you know for any of these cities, I mean, the I think Oregon has the most dispensaries per capita of any state in the country. Does that make it even more challenging?

Chrissy: Um, it's, it's definitely competitive out there to to get real estate for dispensaries because of the bubbles and the lack of licenses going out. The real estate that we currently have, we have been sitting on for a little bit to make sure the timing was right to open and move forward with them. And so I would say that that being that we're picky in real estate has been a challenge that has probably taken us longer to get to our second store, which we have upcoming, upcoming here shortly. But I think that it's going to pay off in the long run.

Wayne: Yeah. What made you pick - Portland makes sense, you grew up there, you have that connection. What made you pick Eugene and Cannon Beach versus other cities in Oregon?

Chrissy: Well, let's see here. So Eugene and Cannon Beach. Cannon Beach, I think for us was a natural pick for the coast. I grew up going to Cannon Beach so I obviously had a lot of great things to say about it. I think that our brand resonates well with the the brand of Cannon Beach because I do believe that even a town can, can be branded it is you know, probably one of the wealthier areas along the Oregon coast and we do consider ourselves a premium brand. And it also attracts you know some of the most tourists to the Oregon coast every year and our location, right on the main street of downtown Cannon Beach, really can't be beat. You know the coastal market, with its ebbs and flows of of traffic is going to be interesting, say the least. But I look forward to the challenge of running a store that's based off of so much seasonality. Eugene is you know, I think a great - one of the greatest towns in Oregon. And you know, probably a, I think the building that we got that we have there is in such an up and coming neighborhood that it was Real Estate we couldn't pass up. And, and we look forward to having that built out by the first quarter of next year.

Wayne: Yeah. Were you still looking at other cities, trying to find the ideal real estate location? Or was it decided on those cities and let's stick to our real estate search inside of those cities?

Chrissy: I think we were pretty open to almost anything right? I think it all kind of came down to really finding these these premium locations within a variety of different areas that we were looking at at the time.

Wayne: Okay. One more question on retail, then I want to move over to kind of influencers and the marketing piece of it. But a lot of stores, their second third location, they stick local to where they're at and then maybe some don't, but then expand maybe to other cities after that and some you know, have a lot of store count. What made you not - decide not to stay in Bend, where it's your headquarters, it's close you know the brand would work and a second, third store in that city versus going to - you know these cities are three hours away, over a mountain pass, I mean that's hard to - difficult to manage when they're that much further away. Why not stay inside of Bend and open multiple shops there?

Chrissy: You know, we had a lot of internal discussion when it came to whether or not we wanted to open another dispensary here in Bend. I for one can say I was against it. I did have the fear that it would cannibalize some of our sales at our existing location. But at the same time, Bend is flooded with dispensaries and it just you know, didn't seem worth the effort to open another dispensary here. That's not to say that we are completely against the idea down the line. I think that we are just more excited to enter new markets and start getting traction in other cities.

Wayne: Yeah. Okay. So influencer marketing, you know, it's a big piece of marketing outside of the cannabis industry, but I haven't, you know, maybe more for some California brands and there's celebrities that are signing their names on to things. But I haven't really seen a brand take influencer marketing the way some other companies do and you really have. What is the thought before you started that strategy and maybe just let listeners know kind of what are the detailed finer details of influencer marketing?

Chrissy: Okay, so we have currently athletes that we sponsor so we give them goods that have our logo on it, mainly clothing, and then oftentimes a stipend for products in store and then potentially a small cash monthly bonus to promote the brand and basically be good stewards of the brand. And that kind of came about pretty, you know, pretty organically. I think we had, we found that we had a lot of really talented individuals shopping in our store. But they weren't just talented. They were also out there doing really good things for the community. They were kind, they were really great representations of the Oregrown brand. And so I think that word of mouth is super powerful, especially in a town as small as Bend, and especially with the amount of influence that can be had on social media. And we found the best way to also get free content for our social media was by sponsoring these athletes, right? And I don't know if you've taken a look at our social media, but we do not post any cannabis. And that is, I think, probably unheard of, for the most part in the cannabis industry. We don't post cannabis in and of itself, and we also don't post pictures of people using cannabis. And that we can get into later down the line if you want. But that was after a long series of our page being taken down and I'm sure something that a lot of people in the cannabis industry can relate to. And so we have people out there who use their social media to help promote our brands, but they're also just, you know, good represent - good representatives of the Oregrown brands and kind of help spread the message of what we're all about.

Wayne: Yeah, I would imagine as probably at least in Oregon, one of the first brands to really take this influencer marketing strategy when you're approaching these people. You're talking about cash stipend or free apparel. There's no competition in influencer marketing, no one else is asking. It's like kind of a no brainer for them. I would guess on their end for the most part to go Yeah, that sounds cool. Let's do it.

Chrissy: Yeah, I mean, the only time that we've had, you know, there has been some hesitation as we get into, you know, discussions with bigger and more well known athletes, is conflicts with other existing sponsors.

Wayne: Ah yeah, being connected potential.

Chrissy: Yeah, because a lot of them are sponsored by Red Bull and other big names and we haven't yet had any issues. So...

Wayne: Is there anything you do to - I don't know, it's hard with branding, but on the influencer side, to track effectiveness or metrics when - because you could potentially have 100 influencers or maybe 10 that are a little bigger. I mean, is there certain things you look for when you're working with an influencer to say this is working for us on you know, the brand or marketing or sales or things like that?

Chrissy: Um, I think right now our big focus is ensuring that we have content for social media. Yeah. And so these are people that I can call upon if we need to do a photo shoot for clothing, or, you know, have them just shoot when they go out on the mountain and send us photos. So we always have content, new content coming in. So the brand always kind of feels fresh. And that's why as we go into Portland, it's going to be just as important to find people there who are doing what they love. And, and bringing them on to the team to kind of bring in a new perspective and a fresher, a fresher take on the brand.

Wayne: Yeah, that's really smart. I never thought of it that way. I you know, you're getting the exposure through their audience. But at the same time, the content they're creating does allow for those things that you mentioned. Do any of your influencers or have you also looked at, like writing blogs and a video production or any of them doing that kind of thing for you as well?

Chrissy: We do have so we do have some of our athletes usually kind of travel with photographers so they have friends that are photographers that that you know the kind of go with them places, so we haven't brought anybody on like that yet but that is a great idea something I'll look forward to doing in Portland.

Wayne: Yeah. Yeah. With Pax labs, I'm curious how that started initially and on the branding side aligning Oregrown and I think you did the manufacturing for their pad or pods making those. How did that deal kind of come about and what was the marketing/branding thought behind agreeing to that partnership and doing that?

Chrissy: Um, so I was in the dispensary one day and a guy came up to me, and he had this battery device thing that I had never seen before and he was asking if we had sold - If we sold the pods that went inside of it and I was like I've never even seen this before, what is this? And he had just gotten back from some Expo in Vegas where he had received a Pax Era device on the expo floor, and I immediately called my Pax rep, because at the time they were providing us with the Pax 2 and the Pax 3 flower vaporizers and I asked him what it was all about, and they had just rolled it out in Colorado. So it was the Pax Era platform. So basically Pax is a technology company that goes out and finds Brand Partners, being cannabis companies, that make extracts that can go into their pods and then sell them in the state under their license. So I had a brief conversation with some people at Pax and a few days later they flew one of their VPs out to meet with us. And at that time, they were rolling out the Pax platform in Washington, and they were going to almost do kind of a flyover of Oregon. But we really felt that the Pax vaping experience would really resonate with the Oregon market. Because of its sleek design, its ease of use, and the fact that you can really build these pods with some really quality oil. And we essentially were their only filler here in the state of Oregon until perhaps a few months to a year ago. I've lost track of time and since then they brought on other Brand Partners. But it's definitely one of my favorite ways of vaping. And then we recently came out with our own 510. So not only are we fillers for the Pax Era platform, but we do sell our own 510 vaping systems.

Wayne: Okay, how big was and still ongoing the vaping crisis for you there? What consumers were asking how you approached it? Like, I mean, what was that whole experience and still ongoing experience like for you?

Chrissy: Um, I think I, I can definitely say it did impact sales. And if anyone tells you that didn't, they're not being honest because I've seen it on the wholesale side. And I've also seen it on the retail level. But what was interesting about that is that it did impact the sales of vaporizers but it increased the sales of edibles and flower. So yeah, so for a very long time I feel that the Oregrown store is - you know, in a lot of ways because we do make our own vape and dababbles a vape store more or less. Like our flower numbers are pretty consistent throughout the year. But really when the vape apocalypse came, we saw our per-weekly flowers sales jump up two pounds. So while it did affect the amount of vape units that we were moving, and dababbles for that matter, it really just pushed people back to flower, which is I think, kind of, you know, it's an okay thing. You know, it's the purest form of consuming cannabis, edibles are always going to be there as well. And at the end of the day, now that the ban has been lifted, I think that business is kind of tracking as usual, people are still a little weary of vape. But you know, at the end of the day, we sell products that we would use ourselves and so we can stand behind every product that we sell.

Wayne: Yeah, long term if the you know, the vape or the extract brand really becomes the shining star or maybe it's the vape extracts and retail, could you see yourself potentially walking away from cultivation or, you know, whatever segment of the industry it might be? Or what would be the market conditions that you'd say, okay, we're going to kind of discontinue this line of our business and go more all in more narrow here. Did you see that occurring?

Chrissy: Um, you know, it's hard to say, because I really tried to disconnect myself from the cultivation side of the company, just because, I mean, one only has so much bandwidth, right? You know, I think - I think there was a moment there where the Oregon market felt very flooded with flower. But I think we're kind of taking a turn here and seeing that maybe we aren't as flooded as we thought. And I'm seeing brighter days ahead for the cultivation side. But really, I think we shine very brightly when it comes to retail and the experience that we offer. And I think it's easier to differentiate yourself on the retail side than it is on the wholesale side. There is obviously you've taken away that barrier to entry and being vertically integrated. You know, you aren't having to go knock on other people's doors to try to get them to sell your product. So, really what we're trying to do, and what we will likely do is create a situation where we are producing enough product on our own to supply our own stores, and rely less on third party dispensaries to sell our product.

Wayne: Yeah, that makes sense. And as you get a few more stores open, you just see - and this is just business in general, but definitely cannabis. It's like more and more, more bigger, bigger, bigger and, you know, get into as many stores as possible. But I also I mean, I really like a strategy of we make quality products, it's good, it's good value, the price is more premium, why don't we just make what we can sell in our own stores? And you can run a really successful business that way, without, you know, growing as big as possible, intentionally staying more focused. That's interesting as a strategy to do that versus trying to be in every store there is an Oregon.

Chrissy: No, and that's exhausting, right?

Wayne: Haha, yeah. You mentioned I don't know how much you maybe know about this on the cultivation side. But you mentioned the Oregon market being flooded. I'd like to at least get your thoughts. I mean, a year ago, the state said, we have a six year supply of flower. If we stop producing, it's gonna last six years, the prices are falling, everything's bottoming out, race to the bottom. And then all of a sudden, like six months ago is like, oh, the prices are coming significantly back up. Well, what happened there?

Chrissy: Yeah, where did all that weed go?

Wayne: I mean, I understand a small amount potentially going to blac/grey market but not the amount they were discussing, like that just doesn't disappear, especially when it's in the seed to sale tracking system. It's really hard to get that like out of your system illegally. Was it just a miss - analytics guests or calculation on what we actually have? Like? Do you have any idea what happened there?

Chrissy: Oh man, I would hate to speculate...

Wayne: Cuz that surprised everybody. All of a sudden...

Chrissy: I would say that there's probably some leakage to the black market, I would believe that a lot of people went out of business, so I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of it was wasted or went to extracts, which is what is commonly done with excess cannabis. But I, you know, what I do know is that the asking price for flower today is more than what it was six months ago. I mean, everyone thought that you know, as the price per pound was going down that it just wasn't going to stop. And I strongly believed that we had bottomed out. And, you know, even from a retailer's perspective, like I don't, you know, like seeing $700 pounds on the market. You know, I don't like seeing $3 grams being sold at dispensaries. I think that our growers deserve more than that, right? Like that's a lot of work to grow cannabis, whether it's good cannabis or bad cannabis, a lot of work went into all of that. And so I want to see the price per pound go up, I think that there is a happy medium in what the consumer will pay and what you know, and how much money the growers should be making and then the margins of what the middleman should get. And I'm happy to see that the price per pound is going up, I'm happy to see that there's less on the market than there was before. And I think that a lot of that can just be attributed to waste, a lot of going to waste, and not being up to par where dispensaries didn't want to purchase it. It going to be made into extracts and then potentially some leakage, but I wouldn't know how that would occur, like you said in the seed to sale tracking system, that would be a tough one.

Wayne: Yeah. How much do you think, I'm curious of if you're looking at this side - hemp CBD. A lot of farms potentially switching to hemp, and his Oregrown looking at hemp lines and products, anything around that?

Chrissy: Um, I don't know much about olcc licensed growers switching to hemp, I think if anything, they're adding on a separate farm or license to their existing olcc license, because you'd be kind of a fool to give up and OLCC growing license at this juncture, if you're set up appropriately and in compliance with state law, Oregrown does have plans to come out with a CBD line. We would be foolish not to. but I don't that doesn't. That wouldn't mean that we'd be growing the hemp ourselves being from Central Oregon. It truly amazed me this last summer how many alfalfa fields were switched, were switched over to hemp and how how much of it went to waste. So I think that a lot of people have jumped on the hemp bandwagon after the federal laws were lifted, and I think a lot of people learned some really expensive lessons this last summer. Specifically, you know, if you're going to grow something, you better know what you're going to do with it when it's done. We saw a lot of failed acreage around our property this year. And that's never, you know, fun to see. But I think next summer, people will be more prepared, and we'll see more success coming out of him crops out of Oregon.

Wayne: And you said a lot of it was wasted - was that because they just didn't have an outlet to sell it and they couldn't move it or an overgrowth or what happened there?

Chrissy: I think that they weren't prepared to how they were going to dry it. Obviously drying, you know, when you have that much material, is pretty important to prevent mold and mildew and other - and other issues. In addition, we had, you know, some strange hail storms the summer that really destroyed some crops. And yeah, at the end of the day, they had no one to purchase it to make it into oil to make it into products and that - and there was certainly a surplus of hemp coming out of the state of Oregon this year.

Wayne: Yeah. You mentioned you know, growers. I think we have a lot of growers that listen to this and a lot, either were or still are struggling. And you said if they had an OLCC license, they're set up, they're compliant, just to get rid of that wouldn't be wise. If they're struggling right now, what would someone do with an OLCC license if they're compliant? Like is there a strategy they could use just, that's not just kind of walking away from it all on their end that might help?

Chrissy: I would attempt to sell it.

Wayne: Okay. Are there still, like buyers on the grow side then, are people looking still to buy licenses? Because I think for a while there it was like - Oregon is full, like if don't, that's not the place to go to start a business now.

Chrissy: Yeah, yeah, um, but also depends what you're trying to grow, right? You know if you're trying to grow just as much cannabis as possible and you know, going into it without a way of differentiating yourself in the market, you probably won't be successful. But, you know, I think that the craft growers who are hanging on tight, you know, they're not making a lot of money but they're making just enough to get by, or maybe they've had to bring on somebody to cover their losses. I think if they hold on tight enough, and they continue to put in the work to, to create a premium product it's going to pay off in the end.

Wayne: Yeah, yep. Yeah, the quality and then the brand with the good product. That's where that there seems like there's room for that. Yeah, but as far as volume there's it's definitely been saturated. Interesting. Well, Chrissy, I really appreciate the time. A couple ending questions I like to ask guests as we wrap up. Number one, Are you hiring at all? Anything that might be an opportunity for a listener? And then the other piece if you want to let them know about the soft opening, or your other stores, potentially, um, anything around those that you want to let listeners know about?

Chrissy: Um, let's see here. Are we hiring? We're always looking for amazing team members, always. So if you're interested in a job at Oregrown, you can just go to our website and contact us through there. It's just www.oregrown.com. And let's see here. In the next couple weeks, we'll be opening our Portland store which is on the corner of Northwest - or excuse me, Northeast 12th and Couch in Portland, and we will be opening our Cannon Beach store in January of 2020. So just next month, and then our Eugene stores should be open in the first quarter of this next year.

Wayne: Awesome and where can people find you online or follow you to look for those store openings?

Chrissy: Okay, so we are just obviously our website www.oregrown.com is always the best place to go. But we are also pretty active on Instagram. So it's @Oregrown on Instagram, or @Oregrowninc.

Wayne: Awesome. And then just a clarification on the hiring piece - are mostly you looking for budtenders right now? Or could it be marketing, design? Potentially any type of position?

Chrissy: Any type of position.

Wayne: Awesome, someone passionate and like that?

Chrissy: Anybody that's passionate. Yeah. And being familiar with our brand. You know, I mean, that's kind of a tip for just, for coming in and trying to look for a job, is just being familiar with our brand before you come in as always, as always helpful.

Wayne: Yep. Awesome, Chrissy. Well, thanks again for the time. I think this will be a good one for listeners, branding and marketing in cannabis is a new frontier and I learned some new ones from this conversation. So thank you.

Chrissy: Oh, thank you so much. I appreciate your time too, have a great day.

Pe128 Understanding Federal Cannabis Policies

As State markets mature, there is a lot of uncertainty on how cannabis will progress at the federal level. Will the federal government step in with control and influence over regulations? Or will they allow States to have autonomy over their markets? Our guest is Don Murphy, Director of Federal Policies at the Marijuana Policy Project. We discuss the STATES Act, MORE Act, SAFE Banking Act and what hurdles we still have to overcome.

Link to Email List sign up “Join our Community” and get insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Episode Transcription:

Wayne Schwind, Host: Joining us today is Don Murphy, Director of federal policies for the Marijuana Policy Project. excited to have you on today Don and learn a little bit more about what's happening at the federal level. I know multiple acts are being floated around one passed the House Committee, and a lot of uncertainty and unknown from the you know, business side or people operating in the industry. So thank you for taking the time to come on and share some insights with us.

Don Murphy, Guest: Thank you for the invitation.

Wayne: Let's start with just context for listeners introduction. I'm assuming most have heard of the Marijuana Policy Project, but if they haven't, a quick introduction to what you do as an organization, and then your role there and how long you've been working with them and you know where you're at right now and what you're focusing on?

Don: Well, let me start with my history, because my history and MPP sort of intertwine. 20 years ago, I was a Maryland state legislator. Member of the House of Delegates, I was introduced to a gentleman who was using marijuana for medical purposes. I am a, or was a, law and order Republican. I got elected in part on the platform of law and order after my wife was held up in an armed robbery. I won an election, I got put on the Judiciary Committee and honestly, I was gonna lock up everybody. And I met this gentleman named Daryl Putman. He was a Green Beret Special Forces Vietnam veteran. He said to me, he was using marijuana with his doctor's approval. And, uh, you know, he said, Do you think I'm a criminal? And I hesitated, but I was pretty firm. I said, No, I don't. My dad he'd just passed away from from cancer, but I didn't know anything about marijuana as an alternative to cancer treatment or as a part of cancer treatment. That was - wasn't something that was ever suggested. And this was back in 2000, actually 1999. So he said, "Do you think I'm a criminal?" I said, "No". He said, "Well, the law does. And you're a lawmaker. So unless you do something to change the law. You know, you really do think I'm a criminal". And he had a point. So from that point on, I became the unlikely advocate for marijuana policy reform for medical patients. 20 years ago, I was introduced to the Marijuana Policy Project they were doing ballot initiatives and working in the States, they were just a brand new organization just a few years old at the time, but since then MPP is the leading advocacy group for ballot initiatives for both medical and adult use. In those states that have adult use, we're responsible for, I think, eight of them, maybe nine and a half depending - we've run all those ballot initiatives and most recently, we worked to pass through the legislature in Illinois, their adult use program.

Wayne: How many years with MPP did you say?

Don: MPP is been around almost 25 years and while I was in the legislature, I work with them and then I didn't run for reelection in 2002. And I received a grant from them to go in and mostly talk to republicans around the country about why marijuana policy reform was consistent with conservative values. And we did that off and on for a dozen years or so. And then, recently I came on board full time to work just on Capitol Hill.

Wayne: Got it. Right. And now you're mostly focused just on the federal policies, and less on individual states? I mean, that all ties together, obviously, but?

Don: Right, that's correct.

Wayne: Okay. So yeah, I thought for today's conversation, and we talked a little bit beforehand, from you know, who listens to this podcast, our background here - you know, we're small, medium sized craft businesses, and all these things, how they move around in the government, or, you know, they're confusing and a lot of uncertainty. So I wanted to get some clarity at the federal level where we're at now, you know, what the future might look like? And it seems from what I read and articles and what's going on, there's kind of a few acts that are competing, potentially to get pushed through or legalized and so you have the STATES Act, which you know, seems like initially that had some traction, more recently the MORE act and then another one, the SAFE Banking Act - between those three, and maybe none of them go through in the future, and there's a different act potentially that could come about - where do those stand? I mean, how do you compare those? Is there one that's better than the other? And I think we just start with a general overview. And then we could go deeper into each one and the details and you know, what the interests are, why it'll pass, why it won't pass. But could we do a summary of each of those and kind of clarify for listeners what each one just is exactly.

Don: Sure. So the SAFE Banking Act - You asked the question is, is one better than the other, the better - the best one is the one that passes and becomes a law. Everything else is just noise. But when you're an advocate in a space that is so new as this one, everything is historic. So we use that word too much, because everything we do is historic, right? We have, we have a bill hearing - oh, it's a historic bill hearing. We have a vote, that's historic. It passes, even if it doesn't pass - it's still historic. So we joke about that a little bit. But the point is that everything we do is kind of new here. So the SAFE Banking Act would fix the banking system, for the most part and allow folks to use financial institutions to bank their proceeds, for people to use credit cards, that sort of thing when buying cannabis in a retail shop. That has the most traction. It is a bill that was originally drafted about six years ago by Ed Perlmutter from Colorado. He's been working on it forever. When democrats took over the house, they - they finally had a hearing. They passed it out of committee. It took about four months to get it to the floor. Because the truth is, advocates - criminal justice advocates - were unhappy that, that this bill was moving and it was really just perceived to be a sop to industry and the banks. Great. What does this have to do with criminal justice and equity and all that stuff? So I will say, Marijuana Policy Project took the position that incrementalism is better than no -ism at all. Right? So we were, we were somewhat happy with this thing moving because I actually think that in order for federal policy to change the industry, the issue has to be viewed as legitimate. And an industry is not legitimate when it's cash only, right? That's a nefarious industry just on its face - it has to be right? It's under the table. It's cash. It's, it's everything you don't want in a legitimate industry. So we think fixing that is important. We also think that when you deal with the issue of equity, and social justice, there are a lot of folks in this, in this space - who aren't in the space because they don't have access to funds, right? We hear it's mostly a white industry, rich white industry. Well, the truth is there, it's not so much about race - it's class, right? You cannot just walk into this, get a license, and then go to the bank and borrow money to open up a dispensary or facility of any kind. So the SAFE Banking Act would assist with that, would help move that ball forward. So when you ask which one's better - they all are different, but the one that is most likely to pass in the near future could be viewed as the SAFE banking Act. Now, that wasn't always the case. Well, recently, we had the STATES act...

Wayne: Could I hit on that, so a couple of questions there? (Yeah) I really liked that point of, you know, the industry equity and social justice. And I think, you know, you've heard things thrown around, trying to support people that were impacted by the war on drugs, and I look at states and I always thought, well, how easy do they make it for businesses to launch in a state? I mean, if a license is really expensive, there's a cap that just I mean, you're talking about class, right? You have a lot of money to be able to do this. But with the SAFE Banking Act, if that passed, that means it wouldn't de-schedule cannabis, no federal legalization, but it could set up where another act could still come along and be passed after that to fix all those other things that are not addressed by the safe Banking Act. Is that accurate?

Don: That's correct. (Okay.) It's somewhat counterintuitive, because you're like, "Wait a second, you're going to allow banking of the ill-gotten gains from this federally illegal sale of the substance? Right? So I actually once had a member who had voted for the banking amendment when it was in appropriations back in 2014. Yet he voted against the the Rohrabacher Amendment - so he was opposed to the underlying nature of this, right? So I said, "Well, I appreciate your vote for the banking amendment, but where exactly are you expecting folks to bank these proceeds - in the federal 50 ATM machine in the federal prison you think they should be in?" It was just, it was illogical that you would be for one yet not the other. And that's kind of what's happening here. But, you know, said Congress was consistent? So I - I'm happy to take what I can get on Capitol Hill.

Wayne: Okay - yeah. Yeah. So you mentioned the STATES Act next?

Don: The STATES Act basically says, if your state is - if you have a legal program in your state, whether it's a medical or adult use, you are free from federal interference. It's still - it's still federally illegal. Still in schedule one, but but you know, it's a pure state rights play. Now, some of us have problems with this notion that in Colorado, it's not federally illegal, but right next door over the line in Kansas it is, that is. That's, that doesn't make sense to a lot of us. But again, we've got to play the hand we're dealt. So most Republicans seem to be pretty okay with a state's rights view of this right, they kind of have to be, because that's what they talk about, right? They are for - in theory, are for smaller, less intrusive government. So it becomes difficult for them to justify why they think marijuana should be illegal in Colorado when Colorado voters have adopted it. Right? It just - it's inconsistent with pretty much everything they talk about. So that's, that's how we get them. They they are quick to say, "Hey, we're not pro marijuana. We're just pro 10th amendment." Like, I'm okay with that. I don't care how you - I don't care how you get the Yes. Just - let's get there.

Wayne: Yeah, and the 10th amendment is really saying giving any rights that the state establishes or the federal gun is setting - it puts more control and oversight into the states power, is kind of the idea behind the 10th amendment?

Don: Correct. Correct. Yep. (Okay.) So now, I will say that the STATES act had momentum about a year ago, when, when what happened was - and God bless Jeff Sessions. Now I know you never thought you'd hear a federal policy guy say that. But the truth is, what Jeff Sessions did in repealing the Cole Memo is unleashed both Democrats and Republicans on the Hill to, to act - because up to that point, it was fairly they were all fairly comfortable with the status quo. Nobody was really getting arrested. No - you know, in their states, legitimate operators were not getting raided. The only guys getting raided where the guys who were getting fingered by legitimate operators, right? You know, if you are a legitimate operator, you wanted a federal government - you wanted the state to come in and bust the cartel folks, right? If you aren't operating legitimately, you wanted those folks out. So. So, up to that point, everything was fine until - until Jeff Sessions repealed the Cole memo. And look, he did it because, A. that's what he believes and B. It's an Obama era directive. Right? If you're Trump and you're Sessions, you're repealing all that Obama stuff, right? It wasn't even so much it was about pot. It was about Obama, I think was - was the issue for them. So, you know, I've had a number of people say, Trump is bad because he picked Jeff Sessions. He picked Jeff Sessions, because Jeff Sessions picked him. Right? Like Jeff Sessions was an early endorser, like probably the first I think, in the Senate to endorse Trump, which was a really big deal when you think about it, because Jeff session sat on the Judiciary Committee, along with other candidates who were wanting like, like Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, right? They were They will seatmates of his, yet he was endorsing Trump. So Trump picked him to be the Attorney General. And the rest is kind of history. So, but the STATES Act gained momentum because the President acknowledged to the press that he - he supported a states’ rights position like the STATES act. (Yeah. Yeah.) So, so think about it this way. So we've got republican president endorsed the STATES Act, a Republican Senator, in the republican controlled Senate, and then Republicans controlled the house and they had people on that side, so so why wouldn't you take the STATES Act and run with it? Is it perfect? Nope. But whoever thought we could pass any bill with Republican president? Like, you know what, you know, they just thought everything was going to go to hell, in November of 2016 when Trump won, yeah, and that just that just hasn't been the case at all.

Wayne: So the STATES act was really to - it was almost like what the Cole Memo was, but it was formalizing it into an actual act. It wouldn't have de-scheduled it, it still would have been schedule one if the STATES Act passed, but it would've gave the control and autonomy to the states to run their state programs?

Don: That's right. I mean, but the Cole Memo did outline eight ways to stay above the law, so to speak - or, you know, not get, run afoul of the law. And most of those things are incorporated into the STATES Act, okay. Or into those state bills, and the state laws. So anyway, but the STATES act is is sort of falling out of favor, because it doesn't go far enough. Right? So, enter the MORE Act, which comes along in July of this year. Sponsored by the chair of the House Judiciary Committee, Jerry Nadler. Suddenly everybody's like, "Whoa, this is way better." And people started like distancing themselves from the STATES Act. Like, honestly, Elizabeth Warren, who was the lead sponsor, didn't even show up to a press conference for the STATES Act. So, you know, it's like - well, that's that doesn't go far enough. So the MORE Act is a much more comprehensive bill. And so, the other part of that was, is there were advocates who didn't want the banking bill, the SAFE banking bill to move. They've tried to hold that up until the MORE act moved, because they wanted social equity. They wanted restorative justice, they wanted those folks who had been most harmed by the drug war, to benefit before bankers and rich guys. That was - that was the notion there. So there was some infighting between the advocacy community about all this and it really wasn't until it became apparent that the MORE Act was going to move. I think there were probably some negotiations in the back room like, okay, the banking bills going to move because we're going to move it and it's been four months. And you had your chance. And the Financial Services Committee was not going to be held hostage by the Judiciary Committee. And finally, one said, we're going to move this MORE Act too, so that freed up SAFE banking to go to the floor and get 321 votes of victory.

Wayne: In the House, the MORE Act did recently - that was a few weeks ago, was it? November?

Don: That's right. Right. The MORE Act passed just out of committee. Yeah, but it has not gone to the floor yet. And it may be a while for it to do so. It was also sent to a number of other committees, whether they claim jurisdiction or not remains to be seen. I think they're - they may want to slow walk this one a little bit. And, you know, we'll see.

Wayne: Yeah, so it sounds like to me, the - you mentioned, you know, incremental progress is better than no progress. And the way we went through those, those each sounded like a stepping stone, like the SAFE Banking Act is kind of on the finance side, the STATES Act gets protection, and then the MORE Act goes the furthest with what we all ultimately want to see. And, but then it seems a little confusing, because is there an issue with walking through those one at a time or, you know, first starting with the SAFE Banking Act, then the STATES act? When you said, the MORE Act comes along, and people are like, "well, we don't want those other ones now, those aren't good enough." But if you're not going to get nothing, I mean, is there a way to try pushing them all through together? Or does just really one have to be chosen, and then the other ones can't as well?

Don: Yeah, I think part of the problem is, is that some of the folks on the progressive wing of the Democrat Party want more than - more than will pass the Senate, right? Like see to me, it's not a victory if the bill doesn't become law. Right? It's incrementalism if you sort of creep along and okay, now we got it this far and got this far. But that doesn't mean much to the people who are going to get arrested tomorrow. Right? Like I would - I would like to do something that keeps those folks from, from suffering, whether you're a patient or your consumer, or a processor you know, anyone in the industry, who is subject to federal arrest, prosecution and incarceration, you want to fix something sooner rather than later. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good, right. And so the MORE Act, in some respects, is the perfect, but we can't get it over the finish line. So what can we get over the finish line that helps fix this problem sooner rather than later? (Yeah.) And that's where that - we watch all these candidates debate on the stage and we've had some of them say, look Bank - In fact, many of the incumbents senators who are running for president have actually said no bill should go forward that doesn't include these restorative justice provisions. That means the SAFE Banking Act isn't good enough for them and they wouldn't support it. I think that's unfortunate. I think that's short sighted. For what it's worth, we did hear some of that same concern on the health side, yet all, virtually all the democrats, all but one voted for the SAFE Banking Act in the House. So that may be just something that people just say out on the campaign trail, but when push comes to shove, they take what they can get.

Wayne: Yeah. Yeah. And it's, you know, it's confusing for us, you know, operators, you know, we're busy as hell already. I mean, these things hugely impact us, but it's very confusing. We don't fully understand it. So I was under the impression. Well, maybe if the SAFE Banking Act passes or the STATES Act, then the MORE Act can't pass and you're just never going to get those things.

Don: No, no, no, no, no, I will - I will say there are folks who believe you only get one bite at the apple. Meaning, okay, once we take up the SAFE Banking Act or STATES act or you know, something that is not the full complement of legislation that they want, it'll be another generation before they get to fix it. I'm not sure I believe - I'm not sure I believe that. But I understand their concern.

Wayne: Well if the SAFE Banking Act or the STATES Act, if neither one of those moves cannabis from schedule one, I mean, there's clearly a lot of more progress that still needs to be made if either of those passed that I don't think would take a generation. There's such momentum behind this now and it feels like it's still picking up, it doesn't - I don't think it's going to slow down. It just seems like a time thing.

Don: Yeah, well and with every passing election, we get more folks coming into Washington who agree with us. Not because the politics so much, but this is generational. Right? The old guys who have been there and been part of that drug war for as long as they've been in office, they don't just wake up one day because they met me in the hall. You know, I make some comments and they go, "Oh, you're right, maybe I was wrong all those years." They are invested in this, right? They would rather - they would rather retire or lose than change their mind on this. So when they do retire, they're replaced by new folks, those new folks are not, they are not - their fingerprints aren't on the drug war, right? They are not responsible. And that's what I've said about President Trump. He could pretty much on his own, decide this is - we're going to end this now. This is not my drug war. This is not my war. However, if you stay in office for four years or another four years and you do nothing to fix it, then it does become yours.

Wayne: Hm, I see. Yeah. The people that are still in power making those decisions. I mean, they're at all - it's not one person. It's all that momentum, you know, that's in his cabinet or whatever it might be. And then it becomes yours. Yeah.

Don: Right. Now speaking of elections and Trump and all that. The dirty little secret here is, there are reasons to not pass this that are not policy driven. It's all politics. Right? The number one target for Democrats right now is a combination of Cory Gardner from Colorado and Martha McSally from Arizona. She's on the banking committee. He's leading the effort on the SAFE Banking Act - even if it weren’t to pass, does that help him in the election? Does that help her in the election if she votes for it? Probably. You know how much it remains to be seen, but it doesn't hurt. It helps them right? We you're a Democrat, you want to pick up those seats. You're like, why don't we wait on this one? You know, if, if you think this is a win for Trump if he ends the drug war, or fixes - marijuana is descheduled, or whatever. So ends the war on marijuana. Is that good for him politically? I think so. So do democrats want to give him an advantage? No. Now, the same thing works in reverse, by the way, so it's not - this is just not Democrats doing this. But there is a reason not to act just yet for some folks, and that's unfortunate to hear. Yeah, but but you know, let's be honest. I don't think I'm telling you anything you haven't probably either heard or thought but I just wanted to be honest about it.

Wayne: Yeah. With the MORE Act then, so it would remove it from schedule one, would it deschedule cannabis completely? (Yep, yep.) Okay, so it's federally legal, and then would it leave the autonomy to the states to run their programs, or is there a situation where the federal government says, we're going to decide on the regulations or have some control over this?

Don: Well, they - they do a little bit. That's what the, you know what the MORE Act stands for. He talks about, its "marijuana opportunity reinvestment and expungement". Now, just to be clear two things that people don't seem to, they seem to misunderstand - you cannot, this does not expunge all criminal records in the States, where most of these are. This is just federal, right? This - this Act does not do that. Now, it does create some provisions for people to get their records sealed and expunged at the state level, helps him with that, but it doesn't mean that the way it does at the federal level. The other thing is this, this does not legalize marijuana. Right? If your state is a no, it's still a no, but it ends federal prohibition. Right? So it's no longer illegal at the federal level, but it could still be illegal at the state level.

Wayne: Got it - even now, we have like dry counties, for example, it could long term play out that way?

Don: Exactly. And just for what it's worth, I mean, I've seen plenty of people who actually know better to use The L Word instead of the - you know, it's not legalization. You know, it's descheduling. And that does not necessarily mean that the states are going to change, although many of the states remain illegal, because, you know, it becomes very problematic to to have a law books that violates federal law. Sure. Right? You know, how do you, how do you do that? And I know your listeners know that way more than I did. Really, they understand it firsthand.

Wayne: Yeah. Yeah, seems like I mean, you know, talking about these incremental movements. Even if the MORE Act was passed, there's still so much to do on the back end of that, for another law or bill or act to account for like, you know, you said it doesn't expunge at the state level. So now there's another one. And it feels like we want to take as many steps, figure out what steps we can actually take. And if it's only the Banking Act, like let's make that first one. Because even if it's the MORE Act, there's still a lot of work to do.

Don: Yes, and let me give a little shout out to Chris Lindsey on our staff at Marijuana Policy Project, who ran the effort in Illinois. They just passed for the first time - speaking of historic, this is historic because it's the first time a state ever created a legal marijuana framework through the legislative process, not through a ballot initiative. So that bill was something like 600 pages and includes all of this, like from my perspective, I look at what Chris did in Illinois, and say the federal government does not need to get into details here, does not need to get into the weeds about how this is done. Look at what Illinois did. I don't believe that states going forward will allow for people to be still in prison for drug crimes that were committed that are very similar to the legal market that the state puts in place. Right? (Yeah.) It would be hypocritical for a state to do that.

Wayne: I think so.

Don: You know, let's not - let's not spend a whole lot of time at the federal level that we don't need to. Let - leave it to the states to do it. If a state does not want to do this, that's - that's their prerogative. I mean, I can't, you know, after 20 years of arguing for states’ rights, I can't turn around and go "oh, you've got to make them do it." No, no, that's, you know - you want to be a dry county, be a dry county, you want to be a dry state or whatever you would call it in this instance, that's fine. It's like, it's like casino gambling, right? There was a time when only Nevada had it. And then they lifted that prohibition. And now everybody can have it if they want. They don't want it, fine. But anyway...

Wayne: Yeah, yeah. I'd like to talk a little bit about how one of these acts actually moves through the process. Because to me, and I think our listeners, that is kind of a black box that we don't understand. So looking at the MORE Act, it passes the House Committee, what stages are left for it to go through? And what are the roadblocks? Because I've heard a lot of people say, you know, this was historic, like we've been saying, that it passed, but it has no chance. What's the rest of the process look like and where the major hurdles?

Don: Okay, well, whether it's the MORE Act, the STATES Act or the SAFE Banking Act, they would all basically go through the same process. But let's just - we'll talk about more because that's the one that you asked about, but, but the SAFE Banking Act is in a similar position, right? They were in separate committees, they came out of their committees - they were voted on by their, their respective committees. The SAFE Banking Act passed on the floor, went to - goes to the Rules Committee, and they set the rules for how this has to be done and the amount of time each side gets to debate. And then it goes to the floor, whether it is open to amendment or not. And then it's voted on the floor. And then it goes to the Senate. The MORE Act has yet to go to the floor. Now, some of these bills have to go through other committees, because there are committees of jurisdiction, which have issues that may or may not be written into the bill. You know, a banking bill might have a criminal justice aspect to it, so then it has to go to judiciary. SAFE Banking Act didn't have to do that, the MORE Act may have to do that, because it's got, it's got a tax in there - there's a 5% tax right? So that has to go the Ways and Means Committee then right. In less the Ways and Means Committee signs off on it and waves jurisdiction. Okay, and that would speed the process up. I'm somewhat ambivalent about this, but I'll tell you why I might like it to go to other committees, because the more often we have hearings, the more the public debate gets to be held, we get to have this debate about whether this is the right thing to do. And I believe it is. Right? So it gets more press, it gets more talked up. It's you know, it gets a lot of things. And it ultimately has a better chance of passing, it certainly the MORE Act would have a better chance of passing I think, if it went through more hurdles, most people wouldn't think of it that way. But I think in the long run, we'd be better off. Now, could they just pass this thing on the floor and send it over the senate where it would probably die? Yeah, they could do that. And then would we have made incremental change? I guess in some respects, we have had some incrementalism but as long as - if a bill doesn't get sign does it, does it still have an effect? Maybe, maybe not, and that, you know, other people would look at it differently. But in any event, so the bill has to go over to the Senate, it has to have a hearing, generally, has to have a vote in committee, has to have a vote on the floor, and those bills have to be exactly the same. If they're not, then they have a conference committee to work them out. But more often than not, these things just never happen. Like there are thousands and thousands of bills - I think there were like 9000 bills filed last year, and only like 400 of them passed. And that's, that's a pretty low percentage. Right? So when democrats say oh, there are all these bills sitting over in the Senate. Well, there are bills sitting around the House too. But for the most part, they don't get hearings and they don't get votes, which is why even though it's historic when we have a new piece of legislation that's got marijuana in it, we don't get too excited because the chances of that passing are pretty slim.

Wayne: Right? So on the MORE Act, the name I've heard if it went to the Senate was Mitch McConnell, the senate majority leader, would just kill it. Like you mentioned, it wouldn't even have any chance at all. Is it because of this priority in the - you know, where are we at on the priority list? Is it simply that in the, to them, you know, in their mind, it's not as much a priority, or at least on this MORE Act, is there a different special interest or something going on? Because it seems like the public the majority, I mean, you look at the acceptance and people that want to legalize, and you talk to the people I mean, it's, it's alarmingly high and still growing. But so something else is going on behind the scenes of why this isn't enacting and it seems like it should be a pretty big priority, and we're talking about major social impact here.

Don: Well, you would think but, you know, when we all talk about polling, like the polling on this is 60, 7o, 80%, whatever, depending on how you quantify it, right? If it's medical it's close to 90%, if its recreational it's in the 60s or 70s some places - but that support tends to be a mile long and an inch deep. It's not like there are, you know, people on Capitol Hill on a regular basis, other than me, trying to be on these guys to do something, right? The halls aren't clogged with - they're clogged with social justice warriors and climate change, you know, folks and and, you know, pro choice people and pro life people and cancer, all these other folks, but there are very few on this issue. And it's it's somewhat evident when you think about the fact that we've had hours and hours of debate on on the presidential debate stage from the Democrats, and we almost never hear this issue come up. Now, when you poll Democrats, it's off the charts, right? It's probably closer to 100% but they don't bring it up. Why? I guess it's just not priority for them. And that's unfortunate. So in a place like the Capitol, like DC, where time is short priorities are like, you know, everybody's got their own thing. Very few people care that much about this issue. And that's where - that's where your listeners come in, they have to make sure that their elected officials make it a priority. Right? So if you're not talking to your member of Congress about it, who is? You know, you can't blame your member of Congress for not making this a priority, if you haven't made them make it a priority.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah, definitely. We'll hit on that at the end, how listeners can help and support. That's so interesting. So thinking about that, why, you know, Democrats, maybe 100% would be for this, but it doesn't seem to be on the priority list. Is it, you mentioned some of the other lobbying and the interests that are there and it's not a lot around cannabis right now. Is it simply that, that the exposure and for them they're not as aware it might seem like a smaller priority? Is there something from the other side with, you know, other interests? We think of pharma, alcohol, private prisons, like is there lobbying on the other side? Where I can imagine they're looking at this and going, "cannabis is going to be legalized eventually, but the more we can delay it, the more we'll be able to continue to make our money on our systems." Is that a part of this too?

Don: Well, it's not - it's not overtly visible to me. But I do believe it happens, right? Like, I can tell you that when we did a ballot initiative in Arizona, one of the big pharmaceuticals wrote a big check to stop us, and we lost by like a point. So I know they've weighed in. I know, some of the, you know, law and order folks, they don't want - the status quo works for them. Right? They're on the receiving end of all that money, if all that money doesn't have a need to be appropriated because you're not, no longer arresting, prosecuting, incarcerating people for the simple possession of cannabis, then, you know, where are they going to get those funds? What are they going to do? How they get - like it just, it just, that's just the way it is. Now, the sad part here is, is that we're getting fragged by some of our friends in theory, right? If you're a medical marijuana provider, and along comes a ballot initiative to make it legal for adult use in your state, you may not think that's a good thing for you financially. And we saw that play out when we ran a ballot initiative in Maine. Some of the big opponents to our effort were the small mom and pop dispensaries that were providing cannabis to medical patients. So that's all part of this as well. So I didn't want to take a swipe at Big Pharma without being honest about (Yeah) you know how we're getting hit from the inside as well.

Wayne: Yeah, no, it makes sense. There's not the unified front on our end. And that's what a lot of you know, honestly, we are afraid of if it was federal legalization is, you know, who might be behind legalizing? What did these acts mean? And we're all looking like well, big business is going to want a piece of this. And we look at some states like Florida, where you have to have millions of dollars to even operate and the cap on the number of licenses is low, versus Oregon, which is very pro small business and an oversaturation. We're struggling now because there's just so many companies, but yeah, that that fragments that even further and can delay it and make it difficult. But I like how you kind of talked about the MORE Act being, you know, descheduling at the federal level, but leaving the autonomy with the states. So Oregon can be a pro small business state, maybe Florida just doesn't want to be and things could remain that way, but it wouldn't be like a sweeping regulations from the Federal Government and change everything upside down, right?

Don: Right, right, and as I like to point out, the federal government screwed this up, they should just get out of the way. They don't have any jurisdiction with fixing this in my opinion, right? So just like, just let the states do what they want to do. It won't be perfect. This is going to be very painful for a long time and you're seeing that with some of the companies and the stock prices and all that that's, that's happening now. You know, people look at me and they go, man, you got to be making millions or something. I'm like, first of all, I don't do any of that. I don't even have a stock in any of this. Sometimes I think I'm the dumbest man on the planet because when this goes you know, full blown legal where across the states, it's not going to affect me, in fact I'll probably be out of a job. So that, there's that but you know, between now and the time it is sort of rolled out all out. There are going to be a lot of people who make a lot of money and be a lot of people who are gonna lose a lot of money too. And you probably, you all know that probably better than I do. So I'll defer to you on that one.

Wayne: Well that's why I appreciate Marijuana Policy Project advocating for consumers or patients. Because that's always our fear is, you know, who's behind the scenes? What are their motives or interests? Because depending on who pushes an act or why it's legalized, you know, there is a lot of fear of that. And it's hard to know exactly what's going on all the time. Back to the MORE Act so, again, going back to that name, Mitch McConnell, would he just knock it down? Because it's doesn't seem to be a priority. Do we know specifically why it has no chance of getting past the Senate there?

Don: Well, first of all, I think the MORE Act goes beyond where most republicans feel comfortable, okay. There's a tax added. There's, there's an opportunity fund. It's a lot of government intervention. Now, a lot of us think that that probably is necessary because this is not your typical new industry that's being developed. This is not Uber. This is not Airbnb, this is something that was totally illegal, and people suffered because of it. But how do you fix that? How do you unring that bell? Very difficult to work out. But there are a lot of folks who think the MORE Act goes way too far. Right, now, talk about Mitch McConnell - who knew two years ago that Mitch McConnell was going to be hemps best friend, right? And suddenly, like hemp is now legal. And we're working all that out. And, you know, he's putting it on his campaign literature. So you just never know how things are going to change. But he may look at that. The President might look at the MORE Act and say, let's get this done. Let's fix this. Let's do it. Let's do let's do something now. And rightm and get the credit and take it away from Elizabeth Warren. Take it away from Bernie Sanders. Don't let them use that as a campaign position to beat on Republicans. You know, Every time I go to a hearing Democrats are blaming Republicans for the drug war. Nixon, Nixon, Nixon, right? Reagan, Reagan, Reagan. Hey, when Nixon was President and Reagan was president, they had democratic controlled Congresses, right? So, you know, own - own this a little bit, guys. Like that's, to me that's part of the problem, like people won't, won't be honest about how this got done, how this got started, why we are where we are. And maybe if, if people did that - look, I'm the first one to tell you, Republicans are wrong on this issue more often than not, right? They just don't seem to get it. And maybe because, when we talk about polling, everybody says, Well it's 80/20 - 80 in favorite and 20 against - you know who those 20 are? Those 20 are people who vote in Republican primaries. That's the problem for Republicans, right? They get no real benefit for supporting this, because most people in Congress only have to win their primary. And then they're done. Right? They don't have to win a general election. So they don't have to appeal to the opposite party. They just have to not be primary and have someone come into their, you know, outflank them on the right. Democrats, the same thing. Right? AOC came and she outflanked what's his name, and now everybody's afraid of being a primary, which may be part of the reason why we've seen some of these bills move as relatively quickly as they have.

Wayne: Yeah. Was the Farm Bill really surprising for you and legalizing hemp at the federal level?

Don: Well, yes, I will say - (it happened fast!) Yeah, because we, we stayed away from that. Like, I'm, I'm happy that that happened. But we did not, we did not lobby for it. In fact, I even said to the chairman of the two respective House committees back a couple years ago when republicans controlled everything I said, if you bring the hemp bill up, we will not mess with it, we will not try to have it amended to include you know THC cannabis, higher limits, all that - we won't do that. We thought, what's good for hemp is good for us. Right? Move hemp - you know the other beauty of hemp being illegal, I always said was, it just shows how ridiculous the federal law is, right? (God, yeah.) Same thing with schedule one, like marijuana is on schedule one, heroin is on schedule one - Fentanyl? No, no, it's not. But but they're on the same schedule. It's ridiculous and no one can justify it. Right? It's just not justifiable. So, you know, the one thing we haven't talked about that is, that is out there is this talk, a constant talk now of research. Yeah, you know, a lot of folks a lot of opponents use that is a reason to slow walk. You need some research. We need more research. You know what, it's been around for thousands of years right? You had your chance to research it. If you want to research it, fine, but in the meantime, stop arresting these people for it, right? Because by your own admission, if you think you need more research, then aren't you will also saying, maybe it's not prison worthy? And look, and I've had this conversation with Jeff Sessions who says "marijuana's bad". I said, I never said it was good. I just said it wasn't worth going to prison over. It wasn't worth having your life ruined, right? I'm a conservative, fiscal conservative, I don't want to pay for able-body welfare recipients who otherwise should be able to have a job and pay for their own families. And, you know, we often talk about, or we hear about, we don't like to talk about the money, right? Oh, the billions of dollars in tax revenue we're gonna raise. No, I don't want to talk about that because I don't think we should do this for the money. But if you want to talk about tax revenue. How about the money you're not going to spend arresting, prosecuting, incarcerating people? How about the money that comes in? Because Jimmy Jones has a job, and we don't have to pay him welfare to feed his family? How about, you know, looking at it from that perspective? So, you know, it's fun to talk to Republicans about that side of the coin, especially those guys who are like, close to to this, right? You can see them, you know, like, on their face, the anguish of trying to figure out, you know, what to say to me, in support of their current position. You know, they, you know, they're like, I'm like, I love you, but I could love you more. How could I think you're so great on everything else, but you just suck when it comes to this? How could you be so wrong about this, and so right about everything else? It's inconsistent!

Wayne: Yeah, I mean, to us, it just feels like the institutional momentum of the prisons and the budgets and the things that wouldn't be needed, that taxpayers are covering and there's interest in keeping you know that status quo going. I mean, that's how we always look at it from our end, where we're really unfamiliar with what's going on. I mean, this is just our surface level view. And we're guessing, you know, referring to myself, at least operators, you know, just running a business, at the federal and the government level. I just, it's always confusing and seems like a black box of why things are happening. But things don't happen overnight, either. I mean, it's amazing. We're at, we're at now where we actually are. I mean, when I told my parents I was starting this business, they couldn't believe it. They thought it was a terrible idea. Now they're open to it. And I asked them 10-15 years ago, they couldn't imagine this happening. So I mean, we have been making progress, but - but yeah, how we get to the next stage. I have a question-

Don: Just a second to say where we are now is we have, even our opposition sort of like concedes that, oh, people shouldn't be arrested. We should decriminalize it. So my response to that is - okay so you're okay creating this legal market, okay, this legal demand, but not illegal supply, right? I mean, if you think there is a disproportionate number of arrests now between black and white, imagine what it's going to be what it's okay to consume, but not okay to produce and to sell, right? So many drug dealers are going to jail, only growers are going to jail. But, but guys like us, who maybe just want to consume in the privacy of our own home, which is nice, but we have to depend on an illicit market. And we create an illicit market by by having decriminalization only and not having a free market commercial, capitalistic enterprise with interstate.

Wayne: Yeah, I mean, you look at the vaping crisis. People using pesticides, there would be no lab testing. I mean, from a consumer safety standpoint, that is a huge issue. Medical patients are consuming this that have compromised immune systems possibly. I mean, yeah, there's a huge gap there to not legalize the business side - and regulate it, I mean, we love regulations when they're fair.

Don: Right, and when, when people say, you know, oh - this is, this is the pushback that I get from opponents. Hey, this isn't your grandfather's marijuana, right? This is like, hundreds of times more powerful. And I'm like, all the more reason you shouldn't buy it in a baggie. Yeah. Right. Like you're right, it should be labeled. You don't go to a liquor store and just buy something in a brown bottle. Right, it's got a label on it. I have a friend that makes - I have a friend that makes wine. He will give me all the wine I want - do I like it, do I do I take it from him? No, because it's crap. Right? And for the same reasons, I don't want to buy, you know, the product from a street vendor. I want to buy it from a legitimate provider, where you have some sense of the risk because you know, "Oh, this was grown here, this is seed to sale. This is the way it works. These are the pesticides, these are all these." It takes a lot of the fear out of it. And, and that's a good thing.

Wayne: Yeah. But it seems like such a weird argument to me. I mean, yes, consumer education will need to happen, things are more potent, but nobody's dying from this, you can easily go out and buy bottles of everclear that are super potent, but consumers will figure out what works for them. And regardless of the potency now being much higher or lower. I mean, I don't hear any consumers complaining about that. I always hear it used as an opposition argument. But when you look at the markets and the people, like that doesn't seem to be a problem anywhere from what I can tell. Right?

Don: Right. You just, just consume a lot less of it.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah. Or by low - Yeah, people get, their preferences, they find out what they like and then the market adapts because our products need to sell. We can't be making something -you know, if you only make everclear, you probably got a pretty small market segment you're selling into right? (Yeah) Back to what I wanted to ask about, back over to the SAFE Banking Act, I think this was just yesterday I heard Mike Crapo, he's the Senate Banking Committee Chairman, basically said the SAFE Banking Act will not pass or he'll prevent it. And so the question I had is, is that the case now with him in the way, is it not going to happen, at least on the SAFE Banking Act? And some of the things he mentioned and why this is one of his quotes, One was, it doesn't address the high potency of cannabis. There's a lack of research on effects. He's worried about marketing to children. And I was thinking - this is just about banking. Yes, it doesn't address those things, because it's not made to address those things?

Don: That is almost verbatim what I said to him. When, when I heard weeks ago, that he had this interest in in potency limits. And I said, Senator, I said - I'm hearing some rumor that you may be interested in having some potency limits in his bill? He goes, do you really think there should be 100% THC? I said, Well, whether there is or isn't, it shouldn't be in this bill. Because you are basically taking a banking bill, one that is of interest to banks and realtors and insurance companies more than it is us, by the way, right meaning us as an advocacy group, and you're turning it into something that is way more involved than your committee has the jurisdiction to cover, you know, that should be somewhere else. And oh, by the way, the states have limits. And you know, this is just about making sure that legal enterprises within those states can bank I said, and by the way, if you put a - if you put a limit on it, thanks aren't going to be able to - it's going to be untenable, because no banks going to say, when you bring in your cash or you go, you know, to do your electronic transfers, are going to say, "and what was the THC potency on on this, the sales?" They're not gonna know, we already see this with hemp, right? The 3% rule right, if it goes over three, then it's marijuana, its cannabis, it's not hemp anymore and then it's queue people subject to arrest - gonna have the same problem. I believe - and just understand where Chairman Crapo is from, right next door you guys in Washington State - he's in Idaho, right? It's like the state with the least number of legal marijuana laws on the books. There are like three or maybe just one depending on how you count it, but Idaho is the worst. And there he is in Idaho. So he's got to be very - like, to me, He's already doing more than I would have expected from somebody in a state that has nothing. (Yeah.) So I think I think this has the ability to move along. I know the people that are working on this from outside of the cannabis space - bankers, realtors, insurance folks, this is like their number one thing. They want to get the fixed because it's a problem for them. They don't want to get caught up in this. And so they need it to be fixed. I think it's going to be fixed. But you know whether the industry - like from the advocacy perspective, thinks it's much of a win, we'll cheer about it. We're working on it, but it's not what we're ultimately trying to get to (definitely) because it doesn't - it doesn't keep people, really, from prison.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah, without a doubt. When I hear arguments like that, and you kind of pause and go, let me logically think about this. And then you think like, well, that reason doesn't really make any sense. And I think one of two things, either one, he's really uninformed, he's not thinking about it fully. And maybe it's a quick quote and he's just feel like he's got to say something about it, or two there's actually another incentive or motive going on behind the scenes, but this is the only thing he could scrape together to say why to justify what he might do. Is it a lot of times it just uninformed or is, again, we're kind of going back to those, you know, big interests or other things going on - is there something else and is he the ultimate hurdle, like can it still go around without his, you know, approving it I guess or wanting to pass?

Don: Well, he could, he could vote against it and it could still pass, but he sort of has - he sort of has the gavel to let it go or not. Yeah, right. If somebody further up the food chain wants it, then it probably happens. You know, that's how you get to be chairman. Right for, for delivering for others over time. So I don't think he's, I don't want to say he's uninformed, right. He's certainly not as informed as you are. Or maybe I am on this issue. But he has staff, he knows what's going on. And he is looking at a broader picture of things here. Like what else is going on in the Senate and where can we maybe make this work or not work? You know, I think he wants to deliver this for Cory Gardner, right? I mean, I don't know that for a fact. But you don't get to keep the gavel if you lose the majority. Right? And when the majority is as slim as it is, losing the Senator from Colorado could be the difference between you having a gavel or not. So does he want to help Cory Gardner? Certainly he does. Is this going to be the bill to do it? It won't hurt.

Wayne: Right? Yeah. Well, as we get wrapping up here, Don, again, I want to hit on where, how listeners can take action and help, but the last question I wanted to ask after hitting on all you know, STATES Act, MORE Act, SAFE banking. Is it possible - I mean, it really doesn't feel like one of these is going to go through in 2020. Something could always happen. Could another act come along and be something more or different - like are more going to be introduced? Like what's the next year to two look like, or kind of your predictions on the short-midterm forecast?

Don: Well, we often say nothing happens in an election year. But I actually think the reverse could be true as well. Right? Like, this is, this is when in Maryland, we passed their medical marijuana bill in an election year. Why? Because people stood up and said, We want this, make it happen, and jammed it through. I mean, it was like an election year issue. And people didn't want to be on the wrong side of that. So if the president were to hijack the bill, or a bill, or the position, or the issue, something will happen. And there's no telling what the President's going to do, like we - you know, we've been through almost three years of that, right? There is no predicting this President. So, if you think it's not possible, that's probably when it happens. And it will happen just when you least expect it. Right? So I actually - now, understand, I'm pretty much an optimist when it comes to this stuff, if I wasn't, I would find it difficult to get out of bed, get on a train, go to Capitol Hill three days a week and lobby for an issue that was going nowhere, right, that sort of loses interest in a hurry. But I do think we're on the cusp of something very historical, and very beneficial for this issue. And for the people who are involved in it, not only as producers and from the industry side, but from the patients and the consumers as well. Everybody knows this drug war has been a disaster. Everyone knows. Now, I will say there are people who know it's a disaster and say we should double down. But, you know, at least they know we're not winning. Right? So it's time to do something different. I will say that what was disappointing to me is that yesterday, no sorry on Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee had a hearing, another hearing, on the opioid crisis and what to do. And it went on for close to three hours, and no one brought up the issue of marijuana as an alternative to opioids. (Really? Wow.) It's just rarely rarely happens. And so, you know, I continue to be, you know, upset about the fact that we can let, you know, hundreds of people die every day of opioid overdoses. But we can't bring ourselves to say, is marijuana an alternative? There seems to be a number of studies that say, in states where it's legal, the opioid overdose rate is significantly lower than states that aren't. I've handed out that study to many members of Congress, and they just don't seem to want to embrace that as an alternative.

Wayne: That is crazy that it doesn't even come up. You know, obviously, I'm biased. I'm in the industry. I get a lot of emails from people that it's helped in their life. And you know, we've interviewed a PhD neuroscientist showing opioids can be used at a third of their dose, I think it was, with cannabis and have similar effects. I mean, to me, it seems like cannabis is maybe number one, that could potentially be the first steps to help this opioid crisis. I mean, what other ideas are out there? Is there anything else that can even compete with that? I mean, what, you know, lock down more drug laws and you know, hammer things down that way, but that normally just backfires then the other side ramps up. There's more crime, bigger cartels. You know, I don't know, it's interesting. What were some of the points that were discussed or brought up in that?

Don: They said - one of the responses was equine therapy, and yoga. I'm like, seriously, seriously?? It was all I could do stay in the room. So look, I would encourage your listeners who are leading the effort here, right? They are the folks who have an understanding of this issue, of the benefits that it provides for the patients - and the consumers, but you know, really patients. Nobody, nobody on Capitol Hill believes that patients should be arrested, yet they fail to act, right? So you need to put these people in front of them - whether they be patients, whether they be the providers. You don't have to come all the way to Capitol Hill, you all have, you know live somewhere or work somewhere that as a member of Congress, that if you do not invite them to your facility, they have no idea how legitimate it is. Right? They - all many of them know is what they see on The Wire. Right? That's what this is. And unless you change their opinion by sharing what you do with them - make them your biggest advocate. That's what you can do to change things on Capitol Hill. And, you know, if you got a guy who's bad, work to get them out of there - either change his mind or get them out of there. Yeah, if you guys don't do it, then the status quo just continues.

Wayne: So what's the call to action for people - if we're talking about business operators, is there a process? Or is you know, getting to Capitol Hill is really difficult for us, obviously we're busy. Money's always an issue. Do we just email a congressman and ask, "Hey, can you - would you like to come tour our facility?" Is there a specific tone or something to be said about, "here's what my values are". Like, what do you recommend that, basically a call to action for our listeners, on how they can actually take some steps that are practical for them?

Don: There are very few people, percentage wise within a congressional district, that interact with their member. I often say, if you want to be influential on Capitol Hill, well then go to Capitol Hill, but if you want to be influential, you have to know your member of Congress, and to really be influential, they have to know you, right? It's simpler than ever with social media to interact with your member of Congress. They all have a Facebook page, they all have a Twitter account. They all have an Instagram, that you can communicate, can just like them. Even if you don't really like them, you like them, right? And then you see that, you see their information come across their newsfeed and you just start the dialogue. And you make sure that they get a chance to talk to you at a town hall. You - it doesn't even cost any money, you do not have to go to a fundraiser. It's not like that. Right? Like, like if you're guy's really bad, do you really want to go to a fundraiser for them? Do you want to give them money? No, that would probably send the opposite message right? You can, you can be terrible - I'll still give you money. So why would you be good? But you need to you need to educate that person. That person does not know what you know. They have no clue what you know. Right? So share with them the reason that you're in this - you're not in this business to make money. You could do any other business and make money. Why are you doing? Why are you doing this one? Right. Why are you doing one that has so much risk. You are subject to federal arrest, prosecution, incarceration, yet you still do this - Why? So if I'm willing to do this kind of work, as a processor or a cultivator, or dispensary, the least you can do is not put my customers and my patients in risk of federal arrest. Don't make them criminals. All those veterans you talk about, how you sneak veteran should have access to this, thank the veterans you know, thank you for your service - really? You think I should be in jail because I'm using marijuana for my PTSD. That's inconsistent. Yeah, you know, I, I believe veterans will do more to advance this cause than anyone else. So if you've got, if you've got customers in your dispensary, or your facility that are veterans that are benefiting from this, and they're not talking to their elected officials, that's a loss. That's a missed opportunity.

Wayne: Yeah, yeah. I love those points. We're gonna actually - We talked about this in the past with others, you know, what can people do. But I think we're going to make a case study out of this and at least try to, you know, we're going to reach out, maybe get someone to come here and take a tour and we'll document this process. So for people that listen to the podcast and follow, we're going to make some attempts at this. I really like what you said. And I think we need to try to lead by example, and do those things. So getting someone out here and so we'll be sharing that coming up, whether we're successful or not. Either way, so hopefully we can, you know, at least be a - be an example for others that want to do the same thing. So those are really good points. Where can people find you or follow the Marijuana Policy Project if they want to stay up to date on what you are doing?

Don: Well, we have a web page, it's mpp.org. My email address is dmurphy@mpp.org. And we're on Facebook I would, I would suggest you check us out there. If you ever want to come to DC and Get the tour - happy to do that, you know, happy to introduce you to members of Congress. And and you - give you an opportunity to share your story, because your story is more impressive than my story. Right? Like, I'm not in, you know, I'm at a 30,000 foot level here. I'm not on the ground fighting this thing. And so, yeah, I'd love to have you come out and do the tour.

Wayne: Awesome. Well, thanks again, Don, for the time. I think someone can be really helpful for listeners and some clarity around what's going around at the federal level and really appreciate the time. Thank you.

Don: Thank you.

Pe127 Budtender Growth, Money & MA Insider Insights

Business focused episode. 2 topics, 1: How to approach budtender training to make more money and consumer-centric insights 2: What’s going on in Massachusetts? A State with high sales and very few businesses. Our guest is Winston Boney, Co-Founder of The Highly Educated, who previously filled multiple cannabis roles in several States.

Link to Email List sign up “Join our Community” and get insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe126 How to Differentiate a Dispensary

There is a lot of competition in the matured cannabis markets, while most new markets will eventually reach saturation and increased competition. How can a dispensary stand out in such a crowded market? Our guest is Randa Shahin Larkin, Co-Founder of Home Grown Apothecary. We discuss strategies for differentiating dispensaries and brands.

Link to Email List sign up “Join our Community” and get insights we don’t share anywhere else.

Pe123 The Processor Journey of Bootstrapping to Raising Money

The hardest part of running a successful cannabis company is the constantly shifting landscape. What worked last year might not work this year. Our guests are Carrie Solomon & Jody Ake, Co-Founders of Leif Goods and Greater Goods. We discuss their journey and insights on bootstrapping THC products in Oregon, going through a cannabis accelerator program, raising money and now launching a line of Hemp CBD products and Retail store front.

JOB OPPORTUNITY: Hiring for Sales Account Manager for West Coast, also hiring for chocolatier soon, discussed at end of episode.